2012
DOI: 10.1108/10610421211264946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of lower prices on perceptions of brand quality: a choice task perspective

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the negative effect of lower prices on perceived brand quality that has been demonstrated in evaluation tasks arises in a brand choice context. Design/methodology/approach -The effects of lower prices on perceived quality are assessed via two laboratory experiments in which college students participated. Findings -A lower price is associated with lower perceived brand quality in Study 1's evaluation task environment. However, Study 2's results indica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Kashi (2013) perceived quality is an important variable which has impact on purchase intention. During the evaluation of two different unknown brands, price level can play a significant role; a consumer could perceive a higher priced product as a higher quality product (DelVecchio & Puligadda, 2012).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Kashi (2013) perceived quality is an important variable which has impact on purchase intention. During the evaluation of two different unknown brands, price level can play a significant role; a consumer could perceive a higher priced product as a higher quality product (DelVecchio & Puligadda, 2012).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the study of Davis, Inman, and McAlister (1992) evidenced that sales promotion does not necessarily undermine perceived quality. According to DelVecchio and Puligadda, (2012) sales promotions do not have negative impact and can be used to the extent they are profitable. Higher quality is identified as one of the utilitarian benefit of sales promotion (Chandon et al, 2000).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though price reduction would help the firms to sell more in the short run, it would affect the revenues in the long run (Jedidi et al , 1999; Pauwels et al , 2002; Zoellner and Schaefers, 2015). Previous research established that price cuts and promotions erode brand equity, which the brand had gained over a period of time because the brands would get trapped in a low-quality image and generate negative brand associations (Yoo et al , 2000; DelVecchio and Puligadda, 2012; Horváth and Fok, 2013; Rao and Schaefer, 2013). These brands would also be vulnerable to the price reduction strategy of other brands (Bertini and Wathieu, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, Mohd Suki (2013a) put forward that Malaysian studentswere intended to purchase a smartphone though its price was relatively high to enhance their image. Probably, this specific attitude may be interacted with price signalizing theory where consumers consider lower prices as substandard product quality (DelVecchio & Puligadda, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%