2017
DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2017.1365616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Mass Surveillance on Journalists’ Relations With Confidential Sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other reasons for their reluctancy to systematically use safety and security measures include issues with usability, interference with other aspects of their journalistic work (as identified by McGregor et al 2015), and a significant amount of scepticism and fatalism that results in the attitude that what will happen will happen (as previously described by Bradshaw 2017). Unlike in previous research (Henrichsen 2020;Waters 2018;McGregor and Watkins 2016), no one mentioned poor IT skills as a barrier in this respect.…”
Section: Nicolecontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other reasons for their reluctancy to systematically use safety and security measures include issues with usability, interference with other aspects of their journalistic work (as identified by McGregor et al 2015), and a significant amount of scepticism and fatalism that results in the attitude that what will happen will happen (as previously described by Bradshaw 2017). Unlike in previous research (Henrichsen 2020;Waters 2018;McGregor and Watkins 2016), no one mentioned poor IT skills as a barrier in this respect.…”
Section: Nicolecontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Second, another reason for the reluctance to adopt more advanced security practices is that the journalist may have poor IT skills and an inadequate understanding of technological communication systems, including a lack of understanding of the risks (Henrichsen 2020;Waters 2018;McGregor and Watkins 2016). From the perspective of journalists, security tools have usability issues and interfere with other aspects of their journalistic work (McGregor et al 2015).…”
Section: Security and Safety Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Added to the improvements on the E2EE technology, keeping track of the delivery of the information allows senders to be sure that messages are received correctly and privately without fearing that anyone might have intercepted the communication. It should be noted, nonetheless, that this sentiment is not shared by all journalists (see Waters 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyone relying on technologies and infrastructures optimized for data extraction and profiling can become radically transparent for a range of actors (Christl & Spiekermann, 2016). As discussed above, journalists have always been a risk group and a main target for surveillance (Crete-Nishihata et al, 2020;Thorsen, 2019;Waters, 2018). It is well known that a range of actors in different parts of the world, such as secret services, police authorities, and other players, seek to monitor journalists' interactions and to access data stored on their computers (Henrichsen, Betz, & Lisosky, 2015).…”
Section: Mobile Journalism As a Risk For Journalists And As A Supplier For Surveillance Capitalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that a range of actors in different parts of the world, such as secret services, police authorities, and other players, seek to monitor journalists' interactions and to access data stored on their computers (Henrichsen, Betz, & Lisosky, 2015). After the Snowden revelations in 2013, the mass surveillance initiated by state actors and its implications for journalism have been broadly discussed (Bradshaw, 2017;Lashmar, 2018;Mills, 2019;Waters, 2018).…”
Section: Mobile Journalism As a Risk For Journalists And As A Supplier For Surveillance Capitalismmentioning
confidence: 99%