The Effects of Media Capabilities on the Rationalization of Online Consumer Fraud

Abstract

This research develops and tests a model of online consumer fraud to determine how the capabilities of communication technologies affect the rationalization of fraudulent behaviors. The model is based on research about the rationalization of fraud, media capabilities, and computer-mediated deception. This investigation empirically tests this model by analyzing 459 Facebook advertisements and 1,896 surveys completed by university students. The findings indicate that the capabilities provided by communication technologies affect the extent to which media mask cues of deceit and dehumanize others. As a result, some media capabilities increase one's willingness to engage in fraudulent behaviors while other capabilities deter those actions. Media capabilities that mask cues of deceit and reduce social presence increase the inclination of individuals to rationalize fraudulent activities, while media capabilities that expose cues of deceit and increase social presence deter individuals from rationalizing acts of fraud. Media offering greater capabilities for reprocessability and transmission velocity decrease the inclination to rationalize fraud, whereas greater capabilities for anonymity, rehearsability, and parallelism increase the inclination to rationalize fraud. In contrast, symbol set variety does not appear to significantly affect the inclination to rationalize fraud.

The Temporal Dimension of Copresence in Medical Practice: The Case of Telestroke

“…First, studies on copresence highlighted temporal concepts (e.g. immediacy and duration of interactions) as critical for understanding copresence (Harrison, 2018). However, the literature lacks theoretical conceptualization of how copresence varies over time.…”

“…Temporality has been an important element in the theoretical developments of the notion of copresence (Ma & Agarwal, 2007). For example, the duration of mediated interactions and the immediacy of response have been studied as critical factors in attaining copresence (Harrison, 2018). Longer interactions facilitate the flow of information and reduce uncertainty and are, therefore, more conducive to copresence (Srivastava & Chandra, 2018).…”

Are The Model of Fraud Triangle Elements Sufficient Enough to Prevent Fraud?: Evidence In North Sumatra Province

“…Fraud perpetrators generally recognize that their actions are dishonest, but rationalize their actions, because of contextual factors [26]. Another form of rationalization is that they do not show empathy for their victims and assume that this is a revenge due to feeling injustice [27].…”