2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00104.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of mergers on product positioning: evidence from the music radio industry

Abstract: This article shows that mergers between close competitors in the music radio industry lead to important changes in product positioning. Firms that buy competing stations tend to differentiate them and, consistent with the firm wanting to reduce audience cannibalization, their combined audience increases. However, the merging stations also become more like competitors, so that aggregate variety does not increase, and the gains in market share come at the expense of other stations in the same format. The results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
76
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chisholm et al (2006) study first-run movie theaters in Boston and find that theater pairs under common ownership tend to make more similar programming choices. Sweeting (2006Sweeting ( , 2010 investigates how common ownership affects the programming and listenership of contemporary music radio stations, and he finds that common ownership in the same market leads to more differentiation and an increase in listenership. However, he also finds that common ownership of stations in different markets is associated with playlist homogenization, consistent with economies of scale and scope in offering similar programming in different markets.…”
Section: Company Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chisholm et al (2006) study first-run movie theaters in Boston and find that theater pairs under common ownership tend to make more similar programming choices. Sweeting (2006Sweeting ( , 2010 investigates how common ownership affects the programming and listenership of contemporary music radio stations, and he finds that common ownership in the same market leads to more differentiation and an increase in listenership. However, he also finds that common ownership of stations in different markets is associated with playlist homogenization, consistent with economies of scale and scope in offering similar programming in different markets.…”
Section: Company Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars examine how media firms adjust prices in response to changes in competition (e.g., Chandra and CollardWexler 2009). A few studies also study how media firms change their content to do better targeting as a result of competition (e.g., George and Waldfogel 2006;Chandra 2009) or consolidation (e.g., Berry and Waldfogel 2001;George 2002George , 2007Sweeting 2010). Our study of Craigslist's entry differs in that competition is intensified mostly on the classified-ad side of the market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While studies such as Gugler and Siebert (2007) and Dafny (2009) apply instrumental variable methods, other studies use difference-in-difference estimation and employ propensity score matching to establish causality in the evaluation of mergers (see Egger and Hahn (2010) and Ornaghi (2009), among many others). The list of prominent empirical merger contributions is long and includes studies such as Dockner and Gaunersdorfer (2001), Mueller (1980, Goldberg (1973), Baldwin and Gorecki (1990), Ravenscraft and Scherer (1987), Gugler et al (2003), Sweeting (2010), Nevo (2001), andCiliberto, Williams, andZhang (2016), among many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%