2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40616-015-0027-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Multiple Exemplar Instruction on the Relation Between Listener and Intraverbal Categorization Repertoires

Abstract: We evaluated the effects of multiple exemplar instruction (MEI) on the relation between listener and intraverbal categorization repertoires of six typically Analysis Verbal Behav (2015) 31:76-95

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Training listener responses first resulted in emergence of intraverbal responses for only one participant, whereas training intraverbal responses first resulted in emergence of listener responses for both participants. Although this study is the only instructional sequence comparison study that has targeted intraverbals in children with ASD, the outcomes are consistent with most of the other studies on the effects of listener and intraverbal training on emergent responding (Ingvarsson, Cammilleri, & Macias, ; Lechago, Carr, Kisamore, & Grow, ).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Training listener responses first resulted in emergence of intraverbal responses for only one participant, whereas training intraverbal responses first resulted in emergence of listener responses for both participants. Although this study is the only instructional sequence comparison study that has targeted intraverbals in children with ASD, the outcomes are consistent with most of the other studies on the effects of listener and intraverbal training on emergent responding (Ingvarsson, Cammilleri, & Macias, ; Lechago, Carr, Kisamore, & Grow, ).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…With few exceptions (i.e., Arntzen & Almas, ; Carroll & Hesse, ; Lechago, Carr, Kisamore, & Grow, ; Olaff et al, ; Sidener et al, ), the vast majority of studies published demonstrating the effectiveness of MEI in producing functional interdependence originate from the same group of researchers (i.e., Eby et al, ; Fiorile & Greer, ; Greer & Longano, ; Greer, Stolfi, et al, 2005; Greer et al, ; Greer & Yuan, ; Greer, Yuan, et al, 2005; Hawkins et al, ; Nuzzolo‐Gomez & Greer, ; Speckman et al, ). It should be noted that some investigations conducted by independent research laboratories have failed to replicate the outcomes described above (e.g., Lechago et al, ; Sidener et al, ). Additional independent replications on the effects of MEI are warranted to better understand the strengths of this procedure.…”
Section: Application and Significance Of Meimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, different procedural variations of MEI appear to produce different degrees of complexity in emergent responses. In fact, Lechago et al () concluded that their participants' failures to demonstrate novel response forms following MEI may have been due to the complexity of the response required (i.e., intraverbal categorization) following training of relatively simple response forms (selection and tacts).…”
Section: Application and Significance Of Meimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results demonstrated no difference in posttest results. More recent research, however, has included posttests in which the researcher implements repeated measures of the tested relation while interspersing trials of the trained relation or an unrelated mastered task (Delfs et al, ; May et al, ), as well as exposing participants to extinction contingencies during training (Lechago, Carr, Kisamore, & Grow, ). It would be beneficial to evaluate whether any of the aforementioned modifications in the training and/or pre‐/posttest procedures are more likely to affect responding than those examined by LeBlanc et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%