2017
DOI: 10.1177/2332858417726324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of No Child Left Behind on Children’s Socioemotional Outcomes

Abstract: Many people have worried about possible adverse effects of high-stakes testing on socioemotional outcomes. This article uses a difference-in-differences approach to investigate the effects of the introduction of high-stakes testing via the No Child LeftBehind Act on socioemotional outcomes. Data are from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey-Kindergarten Cohort of 1998-1999, a nationally representative longitudinal survey. The 10 outcomes that we examine are from the children's Self-Descriptive Questionnaire… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reback, Rockoff, and Schwartz (2014) used a sample of fifth graders in the 2003–2004 school year to demonstrate that accountability pressure from NCLB, operationalized as whether or not students’ schools were close to the AYP margin, does not adversely affect students’ enjoyment of math and reading as reported by students. Using the same empirical strategy, Whitney and Candelaria (2017) find no influence of NCLB on students’ social and emotional skills, including their perceived interest and competence in academic subjects. However, these studies stand in contrast to a larger body of work that asserts that NCLB, and in particular the testing and accountability components, have increased student anxiety and reduced students’ enjoyment of and engagement in school (e.g., B.…”
Section: School Engagement and No Child Left Behindmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Reback, Rockoff, and Schwartz (2014) used a sample of fifth graders in the 2003–2004 school year to demonstrate that accountability pressure from NCLB, operationalized as whether or not students’ schools were close to the AYP margin, does not adversely affect students’ enjoyment of math and reading as reported by students. Using the same empirical strategy, Whitney and Candelaria (2017) find no influence of NCLB on students’ social and emotional skills, including their perceived interest and competence in academic subjects. However, these studies stand in contrast to a larger body of work that asserts that NCLB, and in particular the testing and accountability components, have increased student anxiety and reduced students’ enjoyment of and engagement in school (e.g., B.…”
Section: School Engagement and No Child Left Behindmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Hypothesis 1 and 2 refer to school-related stress and low academic self-esteem, respectively. Stress can be conceptualized as a reaction to demands that are perceived as being difficult to manage (Wheaton et al 2013). Consequently, school-related stress concerns perceived stress directly associated with demands in school.…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, unlike test-based systems, school-related pressure in the Swedish system is not concentrated on specific test periods but is continuous throughout the school year, thereby increasing the risk of chronic stress (cf. Hallsten, Josephson, and Torgén 2005;Wheaton et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers were mandated to follow an essentially static curriculum that limited teachers' ability to introduce external curricular materials, which caused a rigidity in their teaching abilities (Whitney, 2017). A teacher involved with a study by The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University, stated, "NCLB has become so much the instructional focus that .…”
Section: The Influence Of Evolving Technologies and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%