2001
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-001-0924-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of noradrenergic re-uptake inhibition on memory encoding in man

Abstract: Selective stimulation of the central noradrenergic system at encoding did not result in enhanced long-term memory for emotional material in man.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Data with healthy subjects, however, are not consistent, with some studies failing to observe enhanced memory consolidation for emotional material after selectively manipulating the noradrenergic system (Papps et al, 2002). Of particular interest with respect to the opposing effects on memory performance with different noradrenergic substances (yohimbine vs reboxetine) is the fact that both substances increased heart rate compared to placebo (cf Papps et al, 2002). This supports our conclusion that AMPH's effects on memory consolidation are independent of its arousal effects.…”
Section: D-amphetamine Boosts Language Learning C Breitenstein Et Almentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data with healthy subjects, however, are not consistent, with some studies failing to observe enhanced memory consolidation for emotional material after selectively manipulating the noradrenergic system (Papps et al, 2002). Of particular interest with respect to the opposing effects on memory performance with different noradrenergic substances (yohimbine vs reboxetine) is the fact that both substances increased heart rate compared to placebo (cf Papps et al, 2002). This supports our conclusion that AMPH's effects on memory consolidation are independent of its arousal effects.…”
Section: D-amphetamine Boosts Language Learning C Breitenstein Et Almentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Studies with healthy subjects generally suggest that noradrenergic actions mediate the influence of emotional arousal on memory consolidation (eg Southwick et al, 2002), presumably through its action on the amygdala (McIntyre et al, 2003). Data with healthy subjects, however, are not consistent, with some studies failing to observe enhanced memory consolidation for emotional material after selectively manipulating the noradrenergic system (Papps et al, 2002). Of particular interest with respect to the opposing effects on memory performance with different noradrenergic substances (yohimbine vs reboxetine) is the fact that both substances increased heart rate compared to placebo (cf Papps et al, 2002).…”
Section: D-amphetamine Boosts Language Learning C Breitenstein Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas yohimbine-elicited NE potentiation amplified consolidation and free recall of emotional events (O'Carroll et al, 1999a;Southwick et al, 2002), no effect of prelearning single-dose administrations of 4 and 8 mg reboxetine on emotional recall tested after a 7 d retention interval has also been reported (Papps et al, 2002). In contrast, Harmer et al (2003) found that a 4 mg single dose of reboxetine administered 2 h before testing enhanced free recall of positive rather than negative stimuli in the absence of changes in nonemotional performance or mood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The source of central NE is the locus ceruleus (LC), which responds to novelty (Sara et al, 1994) and emotional arousal (Berridge and Waterhouse, 2003). Pharmacological manipulations that enhance a central NE response to emotional arousal (e.g., by application of reboxetine) (Harmer et al, 2003(Harmer et al, , 2004 (but see Papps et al, 2002) or the ␣2 adrenergic antagonist yohimbine (O'Carroll et al, 1999a;Southwick et al, 2002), have been shown to facilitate episodic memory formation (but see Murchison et al, 2004). In contrast, propranolol selectively compromises the memory benefit for emotionally arousing events (Cahill et al, 1994;Strange et al, 2003;van Stegeren et al, 2005) (but see O'Carroll et al, 1999b) in a manner similar to amygdala damage (Cahill et al, 1995;Strange et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to expectations, reboxetine (8 mg single dose) did not improve attention, memory or learning in healthy adults [79][80][81]. It has been suggested that a single dose is not sufficient for significant effectiveness on cognitive performances.…”
Section: Selective Norepinephrin Reuptake Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 87%