The Effects of Nutrition on Chronic Conditions

Ojo, Omorogieva; Adegboye, Amanda Rodrigues Amorim

doi:10.3390/nu15051066

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Preprint1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Patient Education in Chronic Disease Management

Adinkrah

2024

Physician Assistant Clinics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patient Education in Chronic Disease Management

Adinkrah

2024

Physician Assistant Clinics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of Common Nutritional Indicators in Patients with Different Inflammatory States after Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Real-world Study Running Head：Nutritional Indicators in Inflammatory State

Zheng,

Wei

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and aim: Few studies have investigated the prognostic significance of nutritional indicators in patients with various inflammatory states. Methods Patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for TNM stages I–III gastric cancer were included. Nutritional assessment was performed using commonly used indicators. The patients were categorized into two groups with high and low inflammatory status using the X-tile analysis. Results A total of 1327 patients were enrolled in this study, including 843 and 484 patients in the low- and high-SII groups, respectively. Compared with the SII-low group, the SII-high group exhibited significantly lower GNRI, PNI, CXI, and SMI indices and a higher proportion of patients with malnutrition based on the GLIM and CONUT criteria(all P < 0.05). Multivariate COX analysis revealed that GLIM criteria (overall survival [OS]: P = 0.002; recurrence-free survival [RFS]: P = 0.007) and CONUT (OS: P = 0.010; RFS:P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for OS and RFS in the SII-low group. In the SII-high group, the GLIM criteria, GNRI, and SMI were the independent prognostic factors for OS(all P < 0.05), the GLIM criteria and SMI were the independent influencing factors for RFS(all P < 0.05). The TimeROC curve and AUC demonstrated the robustness of the GLIM criteria in predicting prognosis across various inflammatory states. Conclusions Different nutritional indicators should be considered while evaluating the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer with varying inflammatory states. Compared with other nutritional indicators, the GLIM criteria are more suitable for patients with different inflammatory conditions.

show abstract

The Effects of Nutrition on Chronic Conditions

Abstract: The effects of nutrition on chronic conditions, such as diabetes, obesity, heart disease, and stroke, continue to generate interest among researchers [...]

Cited by 2 publications

References 23 publications

Patient Education in Chronic Disease Management

Patient Education in Chronic Disease Management

Objective Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of Common Nutritional Indicators in Patients with Different Inflammatory States after Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Real-world Study Running Head：Nutritional Indicators in Inflammatory State

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About