The Effects of Online Incivility and Consumer-to-Consumer Interactional Justice on Complainants, Observers, and Service Providers during Social Media Service Recovery

Abstract

Using a mixed-methods approach, the current research examines online incivility in relation to service recovery on social media. First, findings from a netnographic investigation suggest consumer-to-consumer (C2C) incivility results in some consumers holding the firm accountable to address uncivil exchanges on a firm-managed communication channel. Based on the netnographic findings, fairness theory, and justice theory, a follow-up experimental study assesses how online incivility negatively affects service recovery outcomes (firm–consumer justice) when a firm chooses (not) to respond to the incivility. Through these two studies, the current paper proposes a new form of justice (C2C interactional justice) and posits that online service recovery extends beyond direct victims of the incivility (first-party justice) to also include observers (third-party justice). This more nuanced view of justice associated with a service recovery is especially significant when considering the traditional relationships of justice with satisfaction, loyalty, positive word-of-mouth, and other desirable firm outcomes. For practitioners, this research suggests that firms must manage C2C interactional justice on corporate social media channels for both complainants and observers to avoid reputational damage and a loss of customers.

Developing UGC social brand engagement model: Insights from diverse consumers

“…A study verified that the sharing of UGC on social media platforms is based on culture, race, gender, and social context (Xun & Guo, 2017). Previous studies have also supported the precept that those individuals who are physical known, experienced and credible, such as family members or close friends, can positively influence purchase decisions for various brands (Bacile, Wolter, Allen, & Xu, 2018; Djafarova & Rushworth, 2017; Farzin & Fattahi, 2018).…”

Identifying the Types and Impact of Service Provider’s Responses to Online Negative Reviews in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from B&Bs in China

“…The effort of service recovery is often evaluated via the perceptions of justice framework [33]. According to the interactional justice theory (IJT), consumers' perceptions of the fairness of service providers' behaviors toward consumer complaints represent the positive image of the service provider and the high perceived value of the service [34,35].…”

Social media conflicts during the financial crisis: Managerial implications for retail banks

“…The interactive nature of social media communities results in the occurrence of social conflict (Breitsohl, Roschk, & Feyertag, ; Ewing, Wagstaff, & Powell, ), which refers to hostile and uncivil interactions between consumers due to divergences in goals, social norms, and values (Bacile, Wolter, Allen, & Xu, ). Social conflicts are likely to be more prevalent during prolonged negative events such as a financial crisis, as they often are a negative spillover from the accumulation of negative e‐WoM and consumers' individual online complaints over a period of time (Hauser, Hautz, Hutter, & Füller, ).…”