2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2010.035975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of open innovation activity on performance of SMEs: the case of Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0
15

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
58
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a multi-industry approach was preferred, because our aim was to move beyond the prevalent focus on high-tech industries (Van De Vrande et al, 2010). Second, we selected SMEs as they have been largely overlooked in this research field (Huizingh, 2011), despite the fact that they rely to a great extent on inflows and outflows of knowledge to sustain innovation (Bierly and Daly, 2007) and seem to utilise them differently from larger firms (Kim and Park, 2010). Third, we considered the R&D or innovation managers as the most appropriate informants for our survey because of their expertise to make informed assessments about internal 1252 BPMJ 23,6 innovation endeavours, as well as about practices related to knowledge in-sourcing and out-sourcing.…”
Section: Methods 41 Sample and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a multi-industry approach was preferred, because our aim was to move beyond the prevalent focus on high-tech industries (Van De Vrande et al, 2010). Second, we selected SMEs as they have been largely overlooked in this research field (Huizingh, 2011), despite the fact that they rely to a great extent on inflows and outflows of knowledge to sustain innovation (Bierly and Daly, 2007) and seem to utilise them differently from larger firms (Kim and Park, 2010). Third, we considered the R&D or innovation managers as the most appropriate informants for our survey because of their expertise to make informed assessments about internal 1252 BPMJ 23,6 innovation endeavours, as well as about practices related to knowledge in-sourcing and out-sourcing.…”
Section: Methods 41 Sample and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tim et al (2005) noted that the network relationship binding small business and innovation contact has some controversial [14]. Kim & Park (2010) found that not all SMEs' open innovation activities have a positive impact on innovation output through the empirical research on SMEs [15]. Rosenbusch et al (2011) pointed out that the internal innovation projects leaded to better business performance than innovative projects cooperated with external partners, and focusing on external cooperation in innovation projects could not increase small businesses performance.…”
Section: The Impact Of Open Innovation For Smes Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, in today's rapidly-changing business context with technology convergence among various fields, firms are facing a big difficulty in developing new technology and successfully commercializing it in their market [2]. Especially, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are confronted with a bigger difficulty in making technology innovation by lack of their inner capabilities and resources essential for technology development [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%