1981
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3908(81)90040-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of opiate antagonists on food intake are stereospecific

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The depression of food and water intake caused by MR2266 is consistent with previous findings (Sanger et al, 1981;Leander, 1984;, and provides evidence that the drug was active throughout the period of treatment. Similarly the fact that ingestive behaviour returned to normal, one day after removal of the minipumps indicates that the concentration of MR2266 in the brain had fallen rapidly upon cessation of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The depression of food and water intake caused by MR2266 is consistent with previous findings (Sanger et al, 1981;Leander, 1984;, and provides evidence that the drug was active throughout the period of treatment. Similarly the fact that ingestive behaviour returned to normal, one day after removal of the minipumps indicates that the concentration of MR2266 in the brain had fallen rapidly upon cessation of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, it has also been used alone in order to interrupt any K receptormediated activity of the endogenous opioids. In general, the behavioural effects of MR2266 administration have then been interpreted as a result of the blockade of p or K receptors (Sanger et al, 1981;Leander, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown et al (6) and Sanger et al (7) indicated that these suppressions by naloxone are mediated through the blockade of endogeneous opiate receptors (u receptors). If this contention is valid, morphine, an opiate agonist, might facilitate feeding and water drinking in non fasted and fasted rats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the (+)-benzomorphan enantiomer, Mr 1453, which is not only inactive as an opioid antagonist but also ineffective in reducing food intake in deprived rats (Sanger et al, 1981), did not suppress either meptazinol or levorphanol-induced food consumption. These findings confirm the involvement of opioid receptors in meptazinol and levorphanol-hyperphagia and establish the stereoselective reversibility of these ingestive responses by opioid antagonists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%