The effects of optimizing blood inflow in the pedicle on perforator flap survival: A pilot study in a rat model

Abstract

Background Perforator flaps have led to a revolution in reconstructive surgery by reducing donor site morbidity. However, many surgeons have witnessed partial flap necrosis. Experimental methods to increase inflow have relied on adding a separate pedicle to the flap. The aim of our study was to experimentally determine whether increasing blood flow in the perforator pedicle itself could benefit flap survival.Methods In 30 male Lewis rats, an extended posterior thigh perforator flap was elevated and the pedicle was dissected to its origin from the femoral vessels. The rats were assigned to three groups: control (group I), acute inflow (group II) and arterial preconditioning (group III) depending on the timing of ligation of the femoral artery distal to the site of pedicle emergence. Digital planimetry was performed on postoperative day (POD) 7 and all flaps were monitored using laser Doppler flowmetry perioperatively and postoperatively in three regions (P1-proximal flap, P2-middle of the flap, P3-distal flap).Results Digital planimetry showed the highest area of survival in group II (78.12%±8.38%), followed by groups III and I. The laser Doppler results showed statistically significant higher values in group II on POD 7 for P2 and P3. At P3, only group II recorded an increase in the flow on POD 7 in comparison to POD 1.Conclusions Optimization of arterial inflow, regardless if performed acutely or as preconditioning, led to increased flap survival in a rat perforator flap model.

Application of the free‐style brachial artery perforator based propellar flap in the management of axillary hidradenitis suppurativa

“…Using a hand‐held Doppler, the perforator can be easily found. Utilising the freestyle concept and when located near the defect this pedicle is sufficient to achieve a tension free closure 14,15 . However, if the boundaries of the lesion extend beyond the arm, the septo‐cutaneous perforator has to be sacrificed during the debridement.…”

“…Utilising the freestyle concept and when located near the defect this pedicle is sufficient to achieve a tension free closure. 14 , 15 However, if the boundaries of the lesion extend beyond the arm, the septo‐cutaneous perforator has to be sacrificed during the debridement. Thus, it may be cumbersome to find a cutaneous perforator which reaches the axilla.…”