2015
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2014.2385101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Orbital Perturbation on Geosynchronous Synthetic Aperture Radar Imaging

Abstract: Compared with current low-Earth-orbit synthetic aperture radar (SAR), geosynchronous SAR (GEO SAR) is featured with its ultrahigh orbit and ultralong integration time. In this letter, we answer the question whether the orbital perturbation items have effects on GEO SAR imaging during the long integration time and, if so, how they produce errors. To achieve these goals, we first develop a perturbing orbital elements errors model based on perturbation analysis. Then, we propose an accurate analytical expression … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated data and real data are used to validate the proposed method. The simulation experiments are implemented based on the system parameters of GEO SAR in Table I [20], and the micro-motion parameters of a ship are listed in Table II. The simulated data can reflect the high-order slant range and the micro-motion of the target to a certain degree.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulated data and real data are used to validate the proposed method. The simulation experiments are implemented based on the system parameters of GEO SAR in Table I [20], and the micro-motion parameters of a ship are listed in Table II. The simulated data can reflect the high-order slant range and the micro-motion of the target to a certain degree.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1800 s of synthetic aperture time, the fifth diagonal model can meet the requirements. Using Taylor series expansion in azimuth time, the slant range is extended to a fifth-order model by following equation:boldnormalR(ta)=Rc+Vcta+12Acta2+16Bcta3+124Ccta4+1120Dcta5+ where, the expression of Rc, Vc, Ac, Bc, Cc can be obtained in [31]. The value of Dc can be further expressed as:Dc=false(15x15/3275x13x2/4+45x3x12/2+45x1x22/230x4x130x3x2+60x5false)RST in which:…”
Section: Signal Model For Geo Sar Staring Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in [31], the satellite and target kinematic parameters that can be obtained from the orbital elements include the following: a, i.e., the semimajor axis of the orbit, e, i.e., the eccentricity of the orbit, i, i.e., the inclination of the orbit, and Ω , i.e., the longitude of the ascending node, f, i.e., the true anomaly, w, i.e., the argument of perigee. Ignoring the slight stochastic perturbation errors, the osculating orbital elements can be expressed as: {a=am+(normalΔa)sec+(normalΔa)lp+(normalΔa)spe=em+(normalΔe)sec+(normalΔe)lp+(normalΔe)spi=im+(normalΔi)sec+(normalΔi)lp+(normalΔi)spΩ=Ωm+(normalΔΩ)sec+(normalΔΩ)lp+(normalΔΩ)spf=fm+(normalΔf)sec+(normalΔf)lp+(normalΔf)spw=wm+(normalΔw)sec+(normalΔw)lp+(normalΔw)…”
Section: Signal Model For Geo Sar Staring Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These forces could cause temporal variations in the orbital elements and lead to sustained orbital variation and drift, further affecting the SAR movement relative to Earth. In the LEOSAR, orbital perturbations influence little on the Doppler frequency modulation rate (DFMR) and beam-crossing velocity [31]. Correspondingly, the variation in the associated azimuthal resolution is trivial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%