1996
DOI: 10.1177/1059601196213003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Organizational Restructure on Employee Satisfaction

Abstract: In an effort to better understand the multidimensional nature of satisfaction, it is examined in the context of organizational restructuring. This context allows the test of a conceptual model that includes antecedents, components of work-related satisfaction, overall satisfaction, and satisfaction with life. The findings support the notions that (1) organizational restructuring has demonstrable implications for employee satisfaction and (2) work-related satisfaction is a major component of satisfaction with l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
91
2
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
91
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This protective effect was previously identified by Mechteld et al (2003) and Ramirez et al (1996) in their studies of stress, satisfaction and burnout in medical specialists. Apart from a humanitarian perspective, i.e., work-related satisfaction has been shown to be a major component of satisfaction with life (Howard & Frink, 1996), a healthy and happy worker can also be a productive worker (Staw, 1986). For example, increased absenteeism, lost productivity and low levels of commitment can often be a pressing concern for organisations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This protective effect was previously identified by Mechteld et al (2003) and Ramirez et al (1996) in their studies of stress, satisfaction and burnout in medical specialists. Apart from a humanitarian perspective, i.e., work-related satisfaction has been shown to be a major component of satisfaction with life (Howard & Frink, 1996), a healthy and happy worker can also be a productive worker (Staw, 1986). For example, increased absenteeism, lost productivity and low levels of commitment can often be a pressing concern for organisations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job satisfaction is typically defined as an employee' s affective reactions to a job based on comparing desired outcomes with actual outcomes (Cranny, Smith, & Stone, 1992). Job satisfaction is generally recognized as a multifaceted construct that includes both intrinsic and extrinsic job elements (Howard & Frick, 1996). Porter and Steers (1973) argued that the extent of employee job satisfaction reflected the cumulative level of met worker expectations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies have documented a positive association between educational attainment and job satisfaction (e.g., Howard and Frink, 1996;Oshagbemi, 2003), others have reported a decrease in satisfaction as educational levels increased (e.g., Klien and Maher, 1966;Metle, 2003;Vollmer and Kinney, 1995). Other reports have found no association between educational attainment and job satisfaction (e.g., Gordon and Arvey, 1975;King et al, 1982).…”
Section: Educational Attainment Accident Frequencies and Safety Manamentioning
confidence: 99%