2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of organizational Twitter interactivity on organization–public relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
85
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Social media such as Twitter can provide opportunities for organizations to interact directly with the public (Saffer, Sommerfeldt, & Taylor, 2013;Waters, Burnett, Lamm, & Lucas, 2009). Organizations can utilize social media to promote dialogue and two-way conversations with the public (Mersham, Theunissen, & Peart, 2009).…”
Section: Social Media and Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Social media such as Twitter can provide opportunities for organizations to interact directly with the public (Saffer, Sommerfeldt, & Taylor, 2013;Waters, Burnett, Lamm, & Lucas, 2009). Organizations can utilize social media to promote dialogue and two-way conversations with the public (Mersham, Theunissen, & Peart, 2009).…”
Section: Social Media and Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationship establishment through social media has begun to receive attention from public relations scholars (i.e., Briones et al, 2011;Waters & Jamal, 2011;Saffer, et al, 2013). Kent and Taylor (1998) provided strategies for communication professionals to use the Internet to develop relationships between organizations and the public.…”
Section: Social Media Use For Public Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such a context, a company's following is an online community and messages from the company that demonstrate contingent interactivity lead to increased potential for user participation (Wise, Hamman, & Thorson, 2006). The effort to be more responsive is expected to increase positivity toward the company (Saffer, Sommerfeldt, & Taylor, 2013). To examine its effect, this study operationalizes interactivity at three levels: 1) non-interactive (i.e., a company posts a tweet but no user replies to the tweet); 2) reactive (i.e., a company posts a tweet and a user replies to the tweet); and 3) interactive (i.e., a company posts a tweet, a user replies to the tweet, and the company replies to the user's reply).…”
Section: Should Companies Respond To Individual Users On Twitter?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geçikli (2000) noted that a way to improve the effectiveness of marketing tourism services is with the public relations; she also emphasized that the necessities such as to create identity and image of the institution, to recognize the environment, and to integrate by introducing the institution to the environment, can be met with the public relations. 2015; Diga & Kelleher, 2009;Eyrich, Padman, & Sweetser, 2008;Köseoğlu & Köker, 2014;Saffer, Sommerfeldt & Taylor, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%