2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(01)00198-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of ozone, chlorine dioxide, cetylpyridinium chloride and trisodium phosphate as multiple antimicrobial interventions on microbiological, instrumental color, and sensory color and odor characteristics of ground beef

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the reduction levels observed in fourth and seventh group treated with HW followed by LA were greater (P < 0.05) than those observed in groups 3 and 6. Pohlman et al (2002) supported that order of treatment is the most important factor during multiple decontamination applications. Similarly, Gorman, Sofos, Morgan, Schmidt, and Smith (1995) reported the loss of activity of antimicrobial agents when followed by plain water spray washing, possibly due to the physical removal or dilution of the sanitizing agents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the reduction levels observed in fourth and seventh group treated with HW followed by LA were greater (P < 0.05) than those observed in groups 3 and 6. Pohlman et al (2002) supported that order of treatment is the most important factor during multiple decontamination applications. Similarly, Gorman, Sofos, Morgan, Schmidt, and Smith (1995) reported the loss of activity of antimicrobial agents when followed by plain water spray washing, possibly due to the physical removal or dilution of the sanitizing agents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Researchers reported that the order of application of antimicrobial treatments is important when using multiple intervention technologies (Pohlman, Stivarius, McElyea, Johnson, & Johnson, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because efficacy was not improved at increasing spray pressure, temperature, or exposure time (within the ranges evaluated in this study), application parameters of 25ЊC, 20 psi, and 30-s exposure time were selected to evaluate the effectiveness of 1% CPC treatment for controlling the outgrowth of L. monocytogenes on frankfurters during refrig- (20,25 erated storage and for determining the effect on naturally occurring microbial populations, color, and texture of noninoculated frankfurters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singh et al (22) reported that surface treatment of RTE polish sausages with 1% CPC resulted in no practically significant adverse effects on color. Other researchers have reported no negative effect and perhaps even a beneficial effect of CPC on the color of ground beef produced from CPC-treated beef trim (14,20).…”
Section: Monocytogenes Populations (Recovered On Mox) On Frankfurtersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Multiple hurdle technology is the most common and most effective method for controlling risk of pathogens on meat (17,23,29,32). These systems include several sequential food safety interventions in a process to continually provide control through reduction of pathogens (4,17,23,29,32). At present, physical and chemical interventions such as steam pasteurization, hot water treatments, and antimicrobial solution treatments are the most effective interventions used in a U.S. beef harvest floor (14-16, 23, 30, 32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%