Human Computer Interaction 2008
DOI: 10.5772/6311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Panel Location, Target Size, and Gender on Efficiency in Simple Direct Manipulation Tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This outcome is partly consistent with tasks performed in some previous works (e.g. [4], [21], where women were slower than men but were more accurate. The overall number of errors in this study was more than twice as big as in [21] which indicates a more difficult task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This outcome is partly consistent with tasks performed in some previous works (e.g. [4], [21], where women were slower than men but were more accurate. The overall number of errors in this study was more than twice as big as in [21] which indicates a more difficult task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the literature, panel layouts were most often analyzed and optimized from a perspective of moving a hand or mouse pointers between panel components (e.g. [14], [20], [21], [24]) The present paper examines the usability of specific control panel layout types by analyzing the number of errors made (effectiveness) and task execution times (efficiency). These basic analyses are deepened by the detailed exploration of human visual activity temporal parameters, registered during experimental tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of performing numerous visual tests discussed in [24] suggest generally higher efficiency of men (especially in the group under 30) in various types of visual message processing. However, some experimental studies indicate that women, though on the average slower in performing visually guided tasks, are superior to males when the accuracy is taken into account (e.g., [25][26][27]). It seems that our findings support this hypothesis, all the more that subjects had unlimited time to perform the experimental tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there have been many studies investigating the effects of gender on pointing task performances (e.g., Michalski, 2008;Rohr, 2006), while experimental evidence of the gender difference induced by display size effect is rare.…”
Section: Effects Of Motor Scale and Gender On Pointing Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study (Cockburn, Ahlström, & Gutwin, ) showed that the movement (or submovement) type of limbs/fingers and muscle groups (which were defined as “motor scale” in this study, the scale of upper limb joint coordination) used should be considered together with varied directions of cursor movements (i.e., task complexity) to compare the performances between the tasks of input devices. Additionally, there have been many studies investigating the effects of gender on pointing task performances (e.g., Michalski, ; Rohr, ), while experimental evidence of the gender difference induced by display size effect is rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%