1975
DOI: 10.2307/2424110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Partitions on the Growth Rates of Crowded Rana pipiens Tadpoles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth rates of amphibian larvae decline with crowding [67,[77][78][79], and in such cases the sigmoid growth curve assumes a righthand shift. Such density effects have been attributed to (i) interference competition [80,81], (ii) interference and exploitation compe tition [82], (iii) simple interaction [83], (iv) growth inhibitors [84][85][86] and (v) food limita tions [59,79,87], The right-hand shift of the sigmoid growth curve indicates that the initial density of the larvae functions as a negative modulator of growth kinetics. In other words, the growth of an individual larva is inhibited cooperatively by the remaining members of the group.…”
Section: Aquatic Growth Phase and Environmental Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth rates of amphibian larvae decline with crowding [67,[77][78][79], and in such cases the sigmoid growth curve assumes a righthand shift. Such density effects have been attributed to (i) interference competition [80,81], (ii) interference and exploitation compe tition [82], (iii) simple interaction [83], (iv) growth inhibitors [84][85][86] and (v) food limita tions [59,79,87], The right-hand shift of the sigmoid growth curve indicates that the initial density of the larvae functions as a negative modulator of growth kinetics. In other words, the growth of an individual larva is inhibited cooperatively by the remaining members of the group.…”
Section: Aquatic Growth Phase and Environmental Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition mechanisms in tadpoles have been variously attributed to social interactions (Gromko, Mason & Smith-Gill 1973;John & Fenster 1975), food limitation (Savage 1952;DeBenedictis 1974;Seale 1980; Morin & Johnson 1988;Murray 1990), or water-borne growth-inhibitors (Richards 1958(Richards , 1962Rose 1960;Licht 1967;Steinwascher 1979a,b). Reports of growth inhibitors as mediators of competition in tadpoles are confined to laboratory studies where the density of tadpoles used is often artificially high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, before food competition causes negative effects, it seems that "social stress" becomes decisive (Adolph, 1931;Alford and Crump, 1982). Gromko et al (1973) and John and Fenster (1975) assumed that behavioral interactions and their influence on the hormonal control of growth account for the crowding effect. For a wide spectrum of anurans, unfavorable growth conditions like an increased physical harshness (Warner et al 1991), a restriction in food supply (Hota and Dash, 1981;Semlitsch, 1987;Alford and Harris, 1988), or an increased population density (Dash and Hota, 1980;Pandian and Marian, 1985;Warner et aI., 1991) cause slower growth rates, a delay of metamorphosis, and a reduction in transformation size (Wilbur and Collins, 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%