2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of pharmacological blockade of the 5-HT6 receptor on formalin-evoked nociceptive behaviour, locomotor activity and hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenal axis activity in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, in the current study, the agonists did not attenuate freezing when administered before or immediately after training and the antagonist did not attenuate freezing when given before retention, so an acute anxiolytic action is unlikely to explain why only the antagonist decreased contextual freezing when given pre‐training. The 5‐HT 6 antagonist is antinociceptive in a formalin‐evoked pain behaviour (Finn et al ., 2007), and such an action would reduce the effectiveness of the US–CS association if drug was present during training, but not if given before the retention task (as observed herein). However the effect of 5‐HT 6 receptor agonists has not been examined in such paradigms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, in the current study, the agonists did not attenuate freezing when administered before or immediately after training and the antagonist did not attenuate freezing when given before retention, so an acute anxiolytic action is unlikely to explain why only the antagonist decreased contextual freezing when given pre‐training. The 5‐HT 6 antagonist is antinociceptive in a formalin‐evoked pain behaviour (Finn et al ., 2007), and such an action would reduce the effectiveness of the US–CS association if drug was present during training, but not if given before the retention task (as observed herein). However the effect of 5‐HT 6 receptor agonists has not been examined in such paradigms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rats ( n = 11 per group) received a total of six injections of vehicle, 5 or 10 mg/kg SB-399885 (lower dose in isolates only) over the course of 13 days (40–52 post-weaning), with a single injection on the days that locomotor activity, NOD, PPI and acquisition, retention and extinction of CFR were assessed, using a previously described test battery and methods with the tasks ordered from least to most aversive [ 37 , 41 ]. Treatments were administered 30 min prior to each behavioral test, or immediately after CFR acquisition to preclude confounding drug effects on nociception [ 42 ] or affective state [ 38 ]. In all cases, the experimenter was unaware of the treatment received.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First studies on this subject indicated that pharmacological blockade of 5-HT 6 receptors reduce formalin-induced nociceptive behavior [21], and that both local peripheral and spinal 5-HT 6 receptors play a pronociceptive role in formalin-induce pain [20]. Then, both peripheral and spinal 5-HT 6 receptors have been shown to play roles in development and maintenance of formalin-induced secondary mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia [12,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5-HT 6 receptors are exclusively localized in painrelated areas, such as periaqueductal gray, spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion [19], indicating that these receptors may play a pivotal role in pain modulation at different levels of central nervous system. 5-HT 6 receptors have been shown to be pronociceptive in formalin-induced pain [20], and 5-HT 6 antagonists have been shown to reduce nociceptive behavior in the same test [21]. Both peripheral and spinal 5-HT 6 receptors have been shown to play role in the development and maintenance of secondary mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia [12,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%