2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3241994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Politically Connected Audit Committees on the Audit Process: Evidence in Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior literature reveals that a number of studies have examined the relationship between political connections and their impact on the improvement of corporate governance. A number of studies examine corporate political connections within a country, Fisman (2001) for the case of Indonesia, Johnson and Mitton (2003) and Jamil (2018) for the case of Malaysia, Ferguson and Voth (2008) and Niessen and Ruenzi (2010) for the case of Germany, and Agrawal and Knoeber (2000) for a sample of outside directors in the United States. A review of the literature reveals that a number of prior studies that have examined the relationship between political connections and their impact on the development of a firm's performance have extended to examination of the quality of accounting information (Ball et al 2003;Chaney et al 2011), of corporate bailouts for politically-connected firms (Faccio et al 2006), of the performance of connected firms (Johnson and Mitton 2003;Leuz and Oberholzergee 2006), of political favouritism in relation to access to finance (Faccio et al 2006;Mian and Khwaja 2004) and of the value of such connections (Fisman 2001).…”
Section: Political Connections and Audit Committeementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior literature reveals that a number of studies have examined the relationship between political connections and their impact on the improvement of corporate governance. A number of studies examine corporate political connections within a country, Fisman (2001) for the case of Indonesia, Johnson and Mitton (2003) and Jamil (2018) for the case of Malaysia, Ferguson and Voth (2008) and Niessen and Ruenzi (2010) for the case of Germany, and Agrawal and Knoeber (2000) for a sample of outside directors in the United States. A review of the literature reveals that a number of prior studies that have examined the relationship between political connections and their impact on the development of a firm's performance have extended to examination of the quality of accounting information (Ball et al 2003;Chaney et al 2011), of corporate bailouts for politically-connected firms (Faccio et al 2006), of the performance of connected firms (Johnson and Mitton 2003;Leuz and Oberholzergee 2006), of political favouritism in relation to access to finance (Faccio et al 2006;Mian and Khwaja 2004) and of the value of such connections (Fisman 2001).…”
Section: Political Connections and Audit Committeementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aspect remains almost unexplored by researchers, because it is difficult to have access to both external auditors and internal auditors, and because their work remains confidential for strategic reasons (Neu et al 2013). This is necessary because role conflicts are at the core of their practices in planning the scope and plan of an audit (Vinten and Van Peursem 2005;Norman et al 2010;Jamil, 2018) and may have an impact on the roles that they ultimately play within the organisation (Roussy 2013).The paper tries to further explore to what extent political connections may influence the auditor's assessment process and what they are confronted with in their practice throughout the audit process. Nor do we know how they manage themselves when such conflicts happen.…”
Section: Corporate Governance Behaviour: Auditor's Assessment Processmentioning
confidence: 99%