The effects of priming legal concepts on perceived trust and competitiveness, self-interested attitudes, and competitive behavior

Abstract

Socio-legal scholars have suggested that, as a ubiquitous social system, law shapes social reality and provides interpretive frameworks for social relations. Across 5 studies, we tested the idea that the law shapes social reality by fostering the assumptions that people are self-interested, untrustworthy, and competitive. In Studies 1 and 2, we found that people implicitly associated legal concepts with competitiveness. Studies 3 -5 showed that these associations had implications for social perceptions, self-interested attitudes, and competitive behavior. After being primed with constructs related to the law, participants perceived social actors as less trustworthy and the situation as more competitive (Study 3), became more against a political issue when it conflicted with their normative self-interest (Study 4), and made more competitive choices during a prisoner's dilemma game when they believed that social relations were basically zero-sum in nature (Study 5). The implications and applications of these results are discussed.

Research Note—Perceived Firm Attributes and Intrinsic Motivation in Sponsored Open Source Software Projects

“…Empirical research on firm involvement in OSS communities confirms that a sponsor's trustworthiness impacts contributors' reported willingness to expend effort on the project Magnusson 2005, Dahlander andWallin 2006). This finding is consistent with the large body of work that draws connections between individuals' trust in others and their intrinsic desire to act cooperatively (Callan et al 2010).…”

Building Strength or Lending an Ear in Legal Conflicts: Dependence and Conflict Asymmetry as Distinct Predictors of Needs for Support

“…Callan et al. () have suggested that self‐interested and competitive attitudes will be stronger in legal conflicts than in conflicts that are not framed as legal. Others have shown the importance of voice and process control in legal proceedings (Houlden, LaTour, Walker, & Thibaut, ; LaTour, Houlden, Walker, & Thibaut, ; Tyler, Rasinski, & Spodick, ).…”

Evaluating Behavior Priming Research: Three Observations and a Recommendation

“…Justice researchers have primed people with concepts such as justice and morality (e.g., Callan, Kay, Olson, Brar & Whitefield, 2010), researchers on terror management theory primed participants with thoughts of death (see Vail et al, 2012, for a recent review), colleagues interested in religion primed people with God (e.g., Gervais & Norenzayan, 2012), psychologists interested in group behavior primed identity (e.g., Levine, Cassidy, & Jentzsch, 2010), and literally dozens of papers have reported effects of priming people with power (e.g., Galinsky, Gruenfeld, & Magee, 2003;Smith & Trope, 2006;Yap, Mason, & Ames, 2012). Many people may not classify this research as examples of behavior priming, but in our view they are.…”