The effects of product images and working memory load on eye movements

Franzen, Léon; Lacombe, Corina; Gagné, Nathan; Bodur, Onur; Grohmann, Bianca; Johnson, Aaron P.

doi:10.1167/jov.20.11.626

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This approach's flexibility allows for running simulated power and sensitivity analyses for various experimental designs including their specific factors. Our assumptions were based on data from a recent working memory dyslexia study (for details, see R markdown script on the OSF; Franzen et al, 2022). For comparison, an a priori power analysis for a traditional repeated measures ANOVA with a within-and between-subject interaction resulted in a required total sample size of 68 participants (two predictors, Cohen's f effect size = 0.225, alpha = 0.05, power = 95%; Faul et al, 2007).…”

Section: Experimental Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Participants were instructed to respond as quickly as possible using their physical keyboard. Further experimental details are available from the study's Open Science Framework repository (Franzen et al, 2022). b) Raincloud plots (Allen et al, 2019) of the simulated dyslexia checklist scores that served as screening tool after the removal of excluded participants.…”

Section: Experimental Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How to Run Behavioural Experiments Online: Best Practice Suggestions for Cognitive Psychology and Neuroscience

Gagné¹,

Franzen²

2023

Swiss Psychology Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The combination of a replication crisis, the global COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, and recent technological advances, have accelerated the on-going transition of research in cognitive psychology and neuroscience to the online realm. When participants cannot be tested in-person, data of acceptable quality can still be collected online. While online research offers many advantages, numerous pitfalls may hinder researchers in addressing their questions appropriately, potentially resulting in unusable data and misleading conclusions. Here, we present an overview of the costs and benefits of conducting online studies in cognitive psychology and neuroscience, coupled with detailed best practice suggestions that span the range from initial study design to the final interpretation of data. These suggestions offer a critical look at issues regarding recruitment of typical and (sub)clinical samples, their comparison, and the importance of context-dependency in each part of a study. We illustrate our suggestions by means of a fictional online study, applicable to traditional paradigms such as research on working memory with a control and treatment group.

show abstract

Section: Experimental Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Experimental Designmentioning

confidence: 99%