2010
DOI: 10.1002/bin.300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of prompting, fading, and differential reinforcement on vocal mands in non‐verbal preschool children with autism spectrum disorders

Abstract: There are few procedures to teach non-vocal children vocal mands. This study evaluated the effects of prompting, fading, and differential reinforcement on eye contact, pointing, vocal approximations, independent requests and immature mands in three children with Autism Spectrum Disorders who in baseline emitted almost no independent vocal mands. This procedure resulted in a large and socially valid increase in independent vocal mands, other appropriate responses and near elimination of immature mands.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Vocal language interventions for individuals with ASD who have limited imitative speech have involved a variety of behaviorally based strategies (Ross & Greer, 2003). One strategy is to reinforce vocalizations differentially (Drash, High, & Tudor, 1999;Esch, Carr, & Grow, 2009;Esch, Carr, & Michael, 2005;Thomas, Lafasakis, & Sturmey, 2010), and another is prompt delay (Charlop, Schreibman, & Thibodeau, 1985;Charlop & Trasowech, 1991;Matson, Sevin, Fridley, & Love 1990). These strategies have been found to meet the standards of evidence-based practice for individuals with ASD (Wong et al, 2015).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vocal language interventions for individuals with ASD who have limited imitative speech have involved a variety of behaviorally based strategies (Ross & Greer, 2003). One strategy is to reinforce vocalizations differentially (Drash, High, & Tudor, 1999;Esch, Carr, & Grow, 2009;Esch, Carr, & Michael, 2005;Thomas, Lafasakis, & Sturmey, 2010), and another is prompt delay (Charlop, Schreibman, & Thibodeau, 1985;Charlop & Trasowech, 1991;Matson, Sevin, Fridley, & Love 1990). These strategies have been found to meet the standards of evidence-based practice for individuals with ASD (Wong et al, 2015).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another common feature in these studies was the use of prompting, fading procedures, and differential reinforcement as a treatment package. In another study by Thomas et al [7], this treatment package resulted in a significant increase in mand repertoires for three participants with autism and generalization of mands across settings and items for two of the three.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Thomas, Lafasakis, and Sturmey (2010) Prompting or cueing, fading, and differential reinforcement. N = 3; 3-year-old children with autism attending a full time.…”
Section: Intervention Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%