2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1101-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of prophylactic cranial irradiation versus control on survival of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 14 trials

Abstract: BackgroundA recent Japanese study suggested prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) failed to improve survival of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, previous studies showed that PCI was beneficial in reducing the rate of mortality for extensive-stage SCLC. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of PCI on the survival of patients diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC by meta-analysis.MethodsPubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library and Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM) were syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A phase III clinical trial, led by the European Organization Research and Treatment, elucidated a survival bene t and a reduction of symptomatic brain metastasis for ES-SCLC patients which may include asymptomatic brain metastasis patients who received PCI without brain magnetic resonance imaging routinely carried out before treatment [26], whereas, a Japanese study questioned the ndings and con rmed that PCI failed to provide a similar survival advantage in the context of the mandated brain imaging before enrollment [27]. Similarly, several analyses also demonstrated the OS bene t of PCI in ES-SCLC, which were in line with our results [28][29][30]. However, PCI was only administered to 16 patients and no quality of life and limited neurocognition data were available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A phase III clinical trial, led by the European Organization Research and Treatment, elucidated a survival bene t and a reduction of symptomatic brain metastasis for ES-SCLC patients which may include asymptomatic brain metastasis patients who received PCI without brain magnetic resonance imaging routinely carried out before treatment [26], whereas, a Japanese study questioned the ndings and con rmed that PCI failed to provide a similar survival advantage in the context of the mandated brain imaging before enrollment [27]. Similarly, several analyses also demonstrated the OS bene t of PCI in ES-SCLC, which were in line with our results [28][29][30]. However, PCI was only administered to 16 patients and no quality of life and limited neurocognition data were available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As far as we are aware, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk factors for BM in SCLC. Most current meta-analyses focused on one aspect, such as PCI or not in SCLC (101), ED-SCLC (82,90), and resected SCLC (102). Chen et al conducted a meta-analysis to identify risk factors for BM in NSCLC (97).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ge et al published a meta-analysis that was criticized because the heterogeneous population of patients was enrolled (38). This study favored PCI for the improvement in OS (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47-0.69; P < 0.001) and decrease in the incidence of BM (relative risk = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.33-0.69; P < 0.01).…”
Section: Retrospective Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%