1968
DOI: 10.1037/h0025868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of psychotropic drugs on psychological testing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Squire & Chace, 1975;Frith et al 1983;Williams et al 1990). The position with respect to neuroleptic drugs may, however, be less clear: while acute neuroleptic administration does not significantly affect most aspects of cognitive function in normal individuals (Janke, 1980) and seems if anything to improve it in schizophrenics (Baker, 1968;Heaton & Crowley, 1981;King, 1990), the question of deleterious effects with long-term use continues to be raised (Kirkpatrick et al 1987). Anticholinergic drugs are of course known to impair memory under experimental conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Squire & Chace, 1975;Frith et al 1983;Williams et al 1990). The position with respect to neuroleptic drugs may, however, be less clear: while acute neuroleptic administration does not significantly affect most aspects of cognitive function in normal individuals (Janke, 1980) and seems if anything to improve it in schizophrenics (Baker, 1968;Heaton & Crowley, 1981;King, 1990), the question of deleterious effects with long-term use continues to be raised (Kirkpatrick et al 1987). Anticholinergic drugs are of course known to impair memory under experimental conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been an awareness and discussion of the methodological problems in the stimulant drug literature for quite some time (Baker, 1968;Eisenberg, 1968;Fish, 1968b;Freeman, 1966;Grant, 1962;Sprague & Werry, 1971). However, as Conners ( 1971 a) pointed out, the &dquo;generally negative attitude of critical reviewers is not shared by other active workers in the field who take a more 'clinical' approach&dquo; (p. 254).…”
Section: Key Methodological Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many factors that affect a patient's test performance in addition to the presence or absence of brain damage and the precise nature and locus of the lesion, including age, sex, emotional state, nature of the relationship with the examiner, medication, psychiatric status, and motivation (Baker, 1968;Benton & Spreen, 1961;Bruhn & Reed, 1975;Chavez, Schwartz, & Brandon, 1982;Goebel, 1983;Goldstein & Shelley, 1975;Harris, Cross, & Van Nieuwkerk, 1981;Heaton, Smith, Lehman, & Vogt, 1978;Parsons, Morris, & Denny, 1963;Prigatano & Parsons, 1976;Reed & Reitan, 1962;Sweet, 1983). A person making a naive interpretation of test performance in accordance only with published norms fails to take into account the ways in which these factors converge to affect the patient's level of performance.…”
Section: Selecting a Neuropsychologistmentioning
confidence: 99%