2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02856-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of QMix and EndoActivator on postoperative pain in mandibular molars with nonvital pulps: a randomized clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QMix causes death in cells because of its contents. [17,18] CHX in contact with the tissue will bind to the plasma membrane of cells, causing membrane permeability to increase, and this results in an increase in the amount of intracellular Ca 2+ . This causes leakage of the lysosomal enzymes that have potential for cell death, such as phospholipase (membrane damage), proteases (membrane damage and cytoskeletal proteins), endonuclease (breakdown of DNA and chromatin), and ATPase, also defined as F1FO-ATP synthase or Complex V, is located in the inner mitochondrial membrane together with the ETC Complexes I-IV (accelerates the reduction of oxygen).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QMix causes death in cells because of its contents. [17,18] CHX in contact with the tissue will bind to the plasma membrane of cells, causing membrane permeability to increase, and this results in an increase in the amount of intracellular Ca 2+ . This causes leakage of the lysosomal enzymes that have potential for cell death, such as phospholipase (membrane damage), proteases (membrane damage and cytoskeletal proteins), endonuclease (breakdown of DNA and chromatin), and ATPase, also defined as F1FO-ATP synthase or Complex V, is located in the inner mitochondrial membrane together with the ETC Complexes I-IV (accelerates the reduction of oxygen).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual Analogue Scale/Score (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10 (0, no pain; 1 to 3, mild pain [sustainable, sleep is not affected], 4 to 6, moderate pain [sleep is affected and painkillers are usually needed], 7 to 10, severe pain [Sleep is severely disrupted and painkillers are necessary]), was applied to evaluate the pain degree of postoperative patients [15]. In this study, the pain was de ned as greater than 3 on the scale, considered to potentially affect emotional or physical functioning [16].…”
Section: Methods Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies [ 76 77 ] made an effort to standardize the irrigant volume and duration, with results showing no significant difference between manual and sonic irrigation, although the latter resulted in significantly less pain than MDA and negative pressure irrigation. Sonics with QMix (an irrigant mixture of CHX and EDTA) resulted in significantly less pain than sonic or needle-and-syringe irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl [ 78 ].…”
Section: Post-operative Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…⋄ VAS score (1-4) at 4, 24 & 48 hours ⋄ Apical negative pressure (30 sec 1 mL 2.5% NaOCl; needle irrigation of 1 mL 2.5% NaOCl) Yilmaz et al [78] 2019 ⋄ Syringe needle irrigation (1 min 4 mL 2.5% NaOCl) ⋄ Sonic irrigation (1 min 4 mL 2.5% NaOCl of activation) ⋄ Syringe needle irrigation (1 min 4 mL 2.5% NaOCl; 3 mL sterile water; 1 min 3 mL QMix) ⋄ Sonic irrigation (1 min 4 mL 2.5% NaOCl of activation; 3 mL sterile water; 1 min 3 mL QMix of activation) significantly more analgesics at 0 to 24 hours [75]. However, in that study, sonic irrigation was used for a longer time than syringe irrigation.…”
Section: Sonic Irrigationmentioning
confidence: 99%