2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2015.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of R&D investments in international environmental agreements with asymmetric countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And due to heterogeneity, countries may disagree on the coalition they find optimal, such that no equilibrium may exist. More recently, Biancardi and Villani (2015) extend the dynamic model of Biancardi and Villani (2014) (discussed in Section 2) to include R&D linkages and they find that this leads to increased cooperation compared to the pure IEA game.…”
Section: Iea Games With Randdmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…And due to heterogeneity, countries may disagree on the coalition they find optimal, such that no equilibrium may exist. More recently, Biancardi and Villani (2015) extend the dynamic model of Biancardi and Villani (2014) (discussed in Section 2) to include R&D linkages and they find that this leads to increased cooperation compared to the pure IEA game.…”
Section: Iea Games With Randdmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Under the right circumstances, penalties, trade restrictions, minimum participation rules, and permit trading schemes also can boost participation (Rubio and Casino 2005;Carraro, Marchiori, and Oreffice 2009;Karp and Zhao 2010;Harstad 2015). Moreover, in repeated games-which allow countries to join the agreement in different moments-the results are more optimistic than in one-off games (Bloch and Gomes 2006;Biancardi and Villani 2015;Wagner 2016).…”
Section: [A]introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%