2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.02.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of reduced dietary protein level on amino acid transporters and mTOR signaling pathway in pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, we observed that 13.5 and 17.5% CP had the highest and lowest SIDAA, respectively. Similar effects have been recently observed in pigs ( Wang et al., 2017 ). This observation raises the interesting possibility that LP diets may have elevated amino acid digestibility and/or reduced endogenous amino acid flow to compensate intestinal AA deficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast, we observed that 13.5 and 17.5% CP had the highest and lowest SIDAA, respectively. Similar effects have been recently observed in pigs ( Wang et al., 2017 ). This observation raises the interesting possibility that LP diets may have elevated amino acid digestibility and/or reduced endogenous amino acid flow to compensate intestinal AA deficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although glucose and AA transporters have been investigated for more than 40 years, only a limited number of viable hypotheses have been presented to explain the underlying molecular mechanisms and metabolic interactions. For example, AA transporters are widely used as an index when studying cancers or designing medical technologies (151,152). Therefore, researchers need more information related to intrinsic quality if these AAs are to serve as potential regulated sites/targets in cancer therapies or when developing new drugs.…”
Section: Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing N excretion in swine manure can be effectively accomplished by reducing dietary CP intake. However, reducing the protein concentration of diets, with no supplemental crystalline AA, decreases growth performance and meat and carcass quality [9] and inhibits the activity of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and s6 kinase 1 (S6K1), leading to the restriction of protein synthesis [10]. In low-protein diets, the absorption of protein-bound amino acids may be reduced, resulting in impaired animal growth performance if the dietary protein content cannot be further reduced, although the environmental benefits of low-protein diets are significant, the economic benefits are not obvious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%