1992
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1992.47.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Repetitive Community-Wide Ivermectin Treatment on Transmission of Ochocerca Volvulus in Guatemala

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1B, Table 1). Transmission intensity was concomitantly measured only in the Guatemalan study (18), so it is difficult to ascertain whether this is due to a reduction in the force of infection or a cumulative impact of ivermectin on female worm fertility (13,14). No significant difference in the rate of skin repopulation was seen between rounds 1, 2, and 4 if hosts with no detectable microfilariae at the time of treatment were excluded from the analysis (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1B, Table 1). Transmission intensity was concomitantly measured only in the Guatemalan study (18), so it is difficult to ascertain whether this is due to a reduction in the force of infection or a cumulative impact of ivermectin on female worm fertility (13,14). No significant difference in the rate of skin repopulation was seen between rounds 1, 2, and 4 if hosts with no detectable microfilariae at the time of treatment were excluded from the analysis (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible causes of the lower microfilarial load after round 3 have been discussed elsewhere (hosts contributing data from 4 consecutive rounds of chemotherapy largely come from a single study in Guatemala, see refs. 14,18,19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[96][97] Consequently single treatments with ivermectin do not change the infection status of treated subjects, and the effect of ivermectin mass treatment on infection prevalence is primarily due to reduction in transmission. [98][99][100][101][102][103] Between 1987 and 2011, the Mectizan Donation programme approved 139,265,010 ivermectin treatments for Africa. 104 Adverse reactions to ivermectin treatment of O. volvulus infection constitute the body's reaction to the microfilaria killed and include primarily itching, rash, gland pain and tenderness, joint and muscle pain, fever and headache, pulse and blood pressure changes, all of which disappear within a few days.…”
Section: Parasitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase III trials had shown that the drug was effective in preventing ocular lesions, but information was urgently required on how safe the drug was in large-scale treatment and of the effect that mass treatment would have on onchocerciasis transmission. The OCP and the UNDP/ World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) therefore launched a number of community trials to answer those questions (De Sole et al 1989;Taylor et al 1990;Cupp et al 1992;Abiose et al 1993;Boussinesq et al 1995). The largest trial, undertaken in the hyper-endemic focus of Asubende on the river Pru in Ghana, provided the most detailed information on the effect on transmission, showing a major reduction in vector infectivity but still significant residual transmission after treatment (Remme et al 1989a) and a subsequent increase in infectivity levels to near pretreatment levels 12 months later.…”
Section: Ivermectin: a New Tool For Onchocerciasis Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%