1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0897-1897(97)80078-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of research on clinical practice: the use of restraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we can presume that more careful investigation and more in-depth debate among the staff about physical intervention could have reduced its use and promoted alternative approaches as noted by other authors (Flannery et al, 2002;Stratmann et al, 1997).…”
Section: Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we can presume that more careful investigation and more in-depth debate among the staff about physical intervention could have reduced its use and promoted alternative approaches as noted by other authors (Flannery et al, 2002;Stratmann et al, 1997).…”
Section: Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Considering the ethical issues and clinical consequences of physical restraint, many studies have recently indicated strategies aimed at reducing the use of this procedure (Barton, 2009;Downes, Healy, Page, Bryant, & Isbister 2009;Hellerstein, Staub, & Lequesne, 2007;Paterson & Duxbury, 2007;Prinsen & Van Delden, 2009;Sclafani et al, 2008). Staff debate and investigation about physical restraints alone can contribute to reducing the use of this procedure in accordance with many authors who evidenced that assault behavior of patients decreased at the same time professionals' awareness of their own feelings toward aggressive patients increased (Bowers et al, 2006;Forster, Cavness, & Phelps, 1999;Stratmann, Vinson, Magee, & Hardin, 1997). More numerous and well-trained staff (Kontio et al, 2009) and more attention by level-of-care staff were cited as the most important strategies for reducing the use of seclusion and restraints (Wynn, 2003).…”
Section: Physical Restraints: Recent Debatementioning
confidence: 86%
“…These falls may have been exacerbated when patients tried to free themselves or extubate themselves. In a study by Stratmann, Vinson, Magee, and Hardin (1997), physical restraints were used to prevent falls from a bed (72%) or from a chair (40%), to protect medical devices (32%), to prevent wandering (18%), or to subdue agitation (17%). Minnick et al (1998) indicated that nurses use restraints to secure patients with impaired mental status (65%), to prevent falls (60%), and to facilitate treatment (40%).…”
Section: Rationale For the Use Of Restraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 None of the more recent studies describing the relationship between falls and physical restraints has included side rails in their definition of restraint. [43][44][45][46][47][48][49] Thus, this study was designed to analyze the effect of physical restraint reduction on nighttime side rail use and examine the relationship between bilateral side rail use and bedrelated falls and injuries among nursing home residents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%