1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0231(19990630)13:12<1175::aid-rcm639>3.0.co;2-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of sample preparation methods on the variability of the electrospray ionization response for model drug compounds

Abstract: A post-column infusion system was developed in order to analyze suppression of electrospray ionization (ESI) tandem mass spectrometry response in the presence of endogenous plasma interferences. By enabling direct detection of these interfering components, this experimental system was used to analyze the ability of several common extraction procedures to remove endogenous plasma components that cause changes in the ESI response of model drug substances. Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) liquid-liquid, Oasis and Empo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
599
2
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 890 publications
(623 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
11
599
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods could be used to determine whether sample matrix affects performance of a method (Bonfiglio et al, 1999;King et al, 2000;Matuszewski, Constanzer, & Chavez-Eng, 2003;Kaufmann and Butcher, 2005). Common approach to evaluate ion suppression is with post-column infusion of the target analyte in the effluent from the chromatographic column, while analyzing patient samples (Kaufmann & Butcher, 2005).…”
Section: Lc-ms/ms In Clinical Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods could be used to determine whether sample matrix affects performance of a method (Bonfiglio et al, 1999;King et al, 2000;Matuszewski, Constanzer, & Chavez-Eng, 2003;Kaufmann and Butcher, 2005). Common approach to evaluate ion suppression is with post-column infusion of the target analyte in the effluent from the chromatographic column, while analyzing patient samples (Kaufmann & Butcher, 2005).…”
Section: Lc-ms/ms In Clinical Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selectivity was confirmed using multiple sourced and pooled blank brain samples as well as injecting other controlled substances into the assay and monitoring for interference on the direct MS/MS channels for each analyte and internal standard. Regions of ionization suppression were determined using a post-column infusion of the drug standards in methanol while simultaneously injecting an extracted blank brain sample through the analytical column (34). The blank brain sample showed a distinct ionization suppression region from 0.5 to 1.75 min, but this precedes the elution of the synthetic cathinones or their corresponding internal standards.…”
Section: Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regions of ionization suppression associated with the brain tissue matrix were determined using the post-column infusion experiment pioneered by Bonfiglio et al (34). Blank brain homogenate was prepared as indicated above and injected onto the analytical column while methanolic solutions of the analytes and internal standards (1 μg/mL) were infused into the electrospray source using a Harvard Apparatus Pump 11+ (Holliston, MA) through a solvent mixing tee.…”
Section: Selectivity and Ionization Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix effect was evaluated by post-column analyte infusion experiments based on method described by Bonfiglio et al 29 Four different blank plasma sample (including normal, lipemic and hemolysed) were extracted under on-line SPE conditions and chromatographed. No significant ion suppression effect was observed in codeine and IS retention time.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%