2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of sampling on the analysis of archeological molluscan remains: A quantitative approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identifications were based only on diagnostic features on individual fragments, rather than assuming that fragments derive from common taxa (Driver ; Szabó ; Woo et al . ). All taxonomic nomenclature was verified following the World Register of Marine Species online database (WoRMS Editorial Board ).…”
Section: Methods Of Mollusc Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identifications were based only on diagnostic features on individual fragments, rather than assuming that fragments derive from common taxa (Driver ; Szabó ; Woo et al . ). All taxonomic nomenclature was verified following the World Register of Marine Species online database (WoRMS Editorial Board ).…”
Section: Methods Of Mollusc Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Molluscs were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level using Indo-Pacific molluscan reference collections housed at the University of Queensland Pacific Archaeology Laboratory, and reference books and manuals (Carpenter & Niem 1998;Cernohorsky 1967;Poppe 2008). Identifications were based only on diagnostic features on individual fragments, rather than assuming that fragments derive from common taxa (Driver 2011;Szabó 2009;Woo et al 2015). All taxonomic nomenclature was verified following the World Register of Marine Species online database (WoRMS Editorial Board 2015).…”
Section: Methods Of Mollusc Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zooarchaeological samples are the amalgamation of multiple sampling events through time, and sample adequacy is important in any community‐focused research (Woo et al. ). To ensure complete sampling of the late Holocene community, we used a rarefaction curve in R package vegan to eliminate samples that did not adequately represent community richness (R Core Team ; Oksasnen et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both in fact were applied during work at the Neolithic settlement of Arbon Bleiche 3 in the Canton of Thurgau ([ 27 , 28 ]). Yet while the results gleaned from large and small-volume bulk samples have been compared in the past ([ 24 , 25 , 29 ]; see also [ 30 , 31 ]), no direct systematic comparison has been undertaken of the findings stemming from large-volume bulk and small-volume monolith samples except for those of Arbon Bleiche 3 ([ 32 ], 413–414; [ 33 ], 84–85, although the sieving methods of each differed). The reason behind the lack of comparisons is that they are arduous and time-consuming to carry out especially in wetland sites with complex stratigraphic sequences.…”
Section: Introduction and Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%