2004
DOI: 10.3102/00346543074001029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of School-Based Writing-to-Learn Interventions on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Since the early 1970s, many educators have touted writing as a means of enhancing learning. Several reasons have been suggested for this purported enhancement: that writing is a form of learning, that writing approximates human speech, that writing supports learning strategies. Alternatively, some researchers have cautioned that the educative effects of writing may be contingent on the contexts in which it occurs. The research on writing’s effects on learning is ambiguous. This meta-analysis of 48 school-based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
439
1
19

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 590 publications
(476 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
17
439
1
19
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study, students whose learning of photosynthesis included regular writing opportunities demonstrated a better understanding of the topic than their peers who had no writing opportunities. In addition, a review of writing-to-learn interventions by Bangert-Drowns et al (2004) indicated that writing interventions had positive effects on school achievement and content learning, although the effects were relatively small. One factor limiting our results may have been the use of conventional academic measures for content learning as opposed to more nuanced instruments that measure reasoning or concept development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, students whose learning of photosynthesis included regular writing opportunities demonstrated a better understanding of the topic than their peers who had no writing opportunities. In addition, a review of writing-to-learn interventions by Bangert-Drowns et al (2004) indicated that writing interventions had positive effects on school achievement and content learning, although the effects were relatively small. One factor limiting our results may have been the use of conventional academic measures for content learning as opposed to more nuanced instruments that measure reasoning or concept development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, PeerWise combines a ''writing to learn'' activity [22], student-contributed questions [23], and a web-based peer review system [24][25][26] that allows students to be actively engaged in their learning. Nicol [27] also showed that student-contributed questions, in an approach used by Fellenz [23], fulfilled all seven principles of good feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used to gather, remember, and share content information. Furthermore, it is an effective tool for exploring and thinking about ideas (Bangert-Drowns, Hurley, & Wilkinson, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%