1994
DOI: 10.1016/0301-6226(94)90055-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of selection for lean growth and the halothane allele on growth performance and mortality of pigs in a tropical environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the lack of a difference (p > 0.05) in the feed:gain ratio between NN and Nn animals disagrees with Leach et al (1996), but agrees with the results reported by McPhee et al (1994) and Miller et al (1999). Taken together, the lack of statistical differences in average daily gain and the feed:gain ratio indicates that the n allele does not influence these traits in pigs fed up to 65 kg of live weight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the lack of a difference (p > 0.05) in the feed:gain ratio between NN and Nn animals disagrees with Leach et al (1996), but agrees with the results reported by McPhee et al (1994) and Miller et al (1999). Taken together, the lack of statistical differences in average daily gain and the feed:gain ratio indicates that the n allele does not influence these traits in pigs fed up to 65 kg of live weight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The lack of statistical differences (p > 0.05) in average daily gain between NN and Nn animals disagrees with the results reported by Zhang et al (1992) and McPhee et al (1994), and is supported by Leach et al (1996), Miller et al (1999) and Jin et al (2002). On the other hand, the lack of a difference (p > 0.05) in the feed:gain ratio between NN and Nn animals disagrees with Leach et al (1996), but agrees with the results reported by McPhee et al (1994) and Miller et al (1999).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The genotype difference in feed efficiency observed in the current study is equivalent to a saving of approximately 21 kg of feed/pig for pigs grown between 40 and 125 kg, which is of some commercial significance. McPhee et al (1994) also reported a feed efficiency advantage for carriers and reactors over negative pigs. In contrast, several other studies have shown no effect of the halothane gene on feed efficiency (Eikelenboom et al, 1980;Jensen and Barton-Gade, 1985).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Feed efficiency on test did not differ between genotypes either, with differences between NN and Nn pigs ranging from –2 to –9 g of weight gain per kg of feed intake. Literature concerning feed consumption are scarce and contradictory, but there is some evidence that indicates that Nn pigs are more efficient in the conversion of feed (M C P HEE et al. 1994; L EACH et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%