In order to develop the skills and competences required in a professional environment, university students have to reflect on their own role in the learning process. The traditional methods of assessment do not assess reflective thinking, critical thinking, selfevaluation and peer evaluation. The following paper outlines and evaluates the implementation of peer and self-assessment techniques in higher education, in ESP course at the National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" as a case study. The rationale of the alternative type assessment systems is examined, and the efficiency of these methods is evaluated and compared by the use of attitudinal questionnaires completed by the participating students and the lecturer's assessments and feedback. The methodology to investigate the effect of peer and self-assessment as a part of the learning process includes literature observation, case study, developing marking criteria, examples of peer and self-assessment strategies and activities in ESP course. Forty quantitative peer and self-assessment studies were subjected to analysis. The study pointed to differences between self and peer assessments. Peer assessment was found to resemble more closely teacher assessments whereas self-assessment demonstrated difference with teacher's marks. One of the most essential conditions for objective and relevant performance of the evaluation was found as well-understood assessment criteria. Hypotheses concerning the greater validity of peer and self-assessments were not supported. We have drawn the conclusions that the application of peer and self-assessment methods improves students' critical thinking skills, involves students into learning and assessment processes, keeps motivation up to study and provides them with a greater ownership of the whole learning and assessment process. Therefore peer and self-assessment techniques could be effectively implemented in the course of ESP at universities. Keywords: peer assessment; self-assessment; ESP course; assessment criteria; summative assessment; formative assessment; critical judgment.
IntroductionThe process of teaching is always evolving. Nowadays the university education is transforming from the theoretical and academic into the real-life oriented context. We are witnesses of shifts not only in curricula but in educational approach from the teacher focused performance to the student self-directed learning, from assessment measurement model towards the learner empowerment and assessment for lifelong learning. Universities should provide the education that can match the needs of students and employers. Modern employers' expectations of graduates who ought to be motivated, determined and efficient, impact the direction of the education process. With a view of appropriate development of these characteristics, contemporary educational approaches emphasise collaborative and co-operative learning where modern teachers cannot simply assess knowledge of facts by testing, they have to assess the lear...