2001
DOI: 10.1086/322077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Shock Size and Type on Labor‐Contract Duration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation has motivated both theoretical and empirical interest on contract duration. Most of the past empirical research on contract duration has focused on labor contracts (Christofides and Wilton 1983;Christofides 1985;Kanago 1988;Vroman 1989;Murphy 1992;Wallace and Blanco 1991;Rich and Tracy 1999;and Wallace 2001). 7 Our study is the first to provide evidence on the duration of retail distribution contracts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This observation has motivated both theoretical and empirical interest on contract duration. Most of the past empirical research on contract duration has focused on labor contracts (Christofides and Wilton 1983;Christofides 1985;Kanago 1988;Vroman 1989;Murphy 1992;Wallace and Blanco 1991;Rich and Tracy 1999;and Wallace 2001). 7 Our study is the first to provide evidence on the duration of retail distribution contracts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A similar result has been obtained by Gray (1978) in a macroeconomic setting that assumes complete synchronization of all contracts, and by Dye (1985), Harris and Holmstrom (1987), and Danziger (1988) in a partial equilibrium setting. Empirical support can be found in Ehrenberg et al (1984), Christofides (1990), Murphy (1992), Wallace (2001), Rich and Tracy (2004), and Christofides and Peng (2006).…”
Section: Analytical Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Much of the empirical research uses union-firm contract data to test these competing hypotheses, but the results were mixed. For example, see Wallace (2001). 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%