2022
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27051646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Side-Chain Configurations of a Retro–Inverso-Type Inhibitor on the Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus (HTLV)-1 Protease

Abstract: In this study, the effects of side-chain configurations of D-Ile residues of a retro–inverso (RI)-type inhibitor on the human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) protease containing a hydroxyethylamine dipeptide isostere were clarified. Prior to evaluation using the RI-type inhibitor, the effects of side-chain configurations of Ile residues of the substrate peptide on the HTLV-1 protease were examined to estimate the influence of side-chain configurations on enzyme activity. Based on the estimation of the in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enzymes containing stabilizing mutations, such as the HIV-1 PR5 [56][57][58][59][60] and HTLV-1 PR3 [34,35,39,61,62] are used in in vitro assays; therefore, we investigated precursors of stabilized proteases, as well. The stabilized enzymes showed considerably lower mutations tolerance, the number of non-processing mutants was higher in case of the HIV-1 PR5 containing stabilizing mutations as compared to the wild-type (41.7% and 14.3%, respectively), while the wild-type HTLV-1 PR3 was defective for self-processing in almost all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enzymes containing stabilizing mutations, such as the HIV-1 PR5 [56][57][58][59][60] and HTLV-1 PR3 [34,35,39,61,62] are used in in vitro assays; therefore, we investigated precursors of stabilized proteases, as well. The stabilized enzymes showed considerably lower mutations tolerance, the number of non-processing mutants was higher in case of the HIV-1 PR5 containing stabilizing mutations as compared to the wild-type (41.7% and 14.3%, respectively), while the wild-type HTLV-1 PR3 was defective for self-processing in almost all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibitor The docking simulation of the RI-modified inhibitor with HTLV-1 protease, an aspartic protease, indicated that conversion of the side-chain configuration at Ile residues combined with the RI-conversion of the main-chain configuration, including the scissile site configuration, ensured the entire topology of the RI-modified inhibitor was similar to that of the original ligand. 8) The results suggested that a combined RIbased conversion of a transition state mimic inhibitor should yield the same mode of inhibition as the original inhibitor. The inhibitory mechanism of the resulting RI-modified inhibitor was further examined by constructing a Lineweaver-Burk plot.…”
Section: Inhibition Mode Of the Ri-modified Htlv-1 Proteasementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The rate of cleavage for different amounts of substrate (H-KGPPVILPIQAP-NH 2 ) [S] by the recombinant HTLV-1 protease in the absence or presence of the RI-modified inhibitor (0, 25, 50, or 100 µM) was monitored during the initial 15-min reaction period using HPLC, as described previously. 8,9) The enzymatic reaction rate (v, µM/min) was obtained by monitoring a reduction in the peak area corresponding to the substrate, and the resulting 1/v was plotted against 1/[S]. The plots resulted in four straight lines with the same y-axis intercept reflecting competitive inhibition toward the protease (Fig.…”
Section: Inhibition Mode Of the Ri-modified Htlv-1 Proteasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This streamlined production process contributes to their viability for mass production [ 33 ]. The approaches for transforming peptides into peptidomimetics within the realm of antiviral applications involve tactics such as altering terminal structures [ 34 ], substituting amide bonds with isosteric counterparts at particular locations [ 35 ], modifying amino acids [ 36 ], implementing an inverse-peptide strategy [ 37 ], and employing a cyclization strategy [ 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%