2002
DOI: 10.1660/0022-8443(2002)105[0219:teoswi]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Small Watershed Impoundments on Native Stream Fishes: A Focus on the Topeka Shiner and Hornyhead Chub

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
42
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
42
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we found that sites with Topeka shiners had higher relative abundances of rosyface shiners whereas sites without Topeka shiners had higher relative abundances of central stonerollers and non-native largemouth bass. Increased relative abundance of largemouth bass, a top predator, at sites without Topeka shiners is consistent with the findings of other studies (Schrank et al 2001;Winston 2002) and is consistent with hypothesized relationships between introduced largemouth bass and declines in susceptible prey (Tabor 2002;Mammoliti 2002). Knight and Gido (2005) found that largemouth bass did not preferentially forage on Topeka shiners over other native cyprinids; however, because Topeka shiners generally have lower mean abundances than other native cyprinids it may take less predation pressure to cause their extirpations relative to other cyprinids (Rahel 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, we found that sites with Topeka shiners had higher relative abundances of rosyface shiners whereas sites without Topeka shiners had higher relative abundances of central stonerollers and non-native largemouth bass. Increased relative abundance of largemouth bass, a top predator, at sites without Topeka shiners is consistent with the findings of other studies (Schrank et al 2001;Winston 2002) and is consistent with hypothesized relationships between introduced largemouth bass and declines in susceptible prey (Tabor 2002;Mammoliti 2002). Knight and Gido (2005) found that largemouth bass did not preferentially forage on Topeka shiners over other native cyprinids; however, because Topeka shiners generally have lower mean abundances than other native cyprinids it may take less predation pressure to cause their extirpations relative to other cyprinids (Rahel 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These declines have been attributed to a variety of human-mediated habitat changes including agricultural runoff (Cross and Moss 1987;Pflieger 1997), impoundments and habitat fragmentation (Pflieger 1997;Schrank et al 2001;Bouska and Paukert 2010), urban development (Tabor 2002), and the introduction of non-native species including largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) (Schrank et al 2001;Mammoliti 2002;Gido et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, protection of Nocomis spawning habitat benefits numerous species. Where Nocomis is threatened by anthropogenic alterations (Mammoliti 2002;Kemp 2014;Utz 2014), management goals may include providing minimum flows and/or limiting peak flows during the spawning season (Peoples et al 2014). Similarly, gravel supplementation programs in sedimentstarved tailwaters may need to consider Nocomis substrate preference (McManamay et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, after the implementation of a reservoir, a restructuration of the fish community will contribute to the reduction and/or the disappearance of species, including reophilic ones, in addition to probably producing an increase in species adapted to lentic environments , which present a high physiological tolerance and behavioral adaptability, leading to plasticity and, consequently, reproductive success (Gray et al, 2000;Lopes et al, 2000;Mammoliti, 2002;Dias et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%