2016
DOI: 10.1017/jsc.2016.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Smoking Cessation on the Risk Factors for the Metabolic Syndrome: A Follow-Up Study of Veterans

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the impact of short-term smoking cessation on Metabolic Syndrome (Mets) component risk factors, and hormones related to MetS and human metabolism.Methods: Smoking veterans with MetS, attending stop smoking class, were followed up close to one year. Paired comparisons between after the follow up and baseline data were made using t-test.Results: A total of 95 smoking veterans with MetS completed average close to one year follow up. Thirty subjects completely quit for the average of 6 month… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the results of a number of lifestyle modification interventions, the absolute reduction in MetS prevalence following substantial smoking cessation is expected to be no less than 15%. [24][25][26][27][28] The main prespecified secondary endpoint is an absolute change in the sum of the individual factors of the MetS (as defined by NCEP criteria) measured at each study time point (between and within study groups). Other secondary endpoints include change in each individual factor of the MetS (as defined by NCEP criteria) measured at each study time point (between and within study groups) and change of the variables given in table 1B measured at each study time point (between and within study groups).…”
Section: Objectives and Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the results of a number of lifestyle modification interventions, the absolute reduction in MetS prevalence following substantial smoking cessation is expected to be no less than 15%. [24][25][26][27][28] The main prespecified secondary endpoint is an absolute change in the sum of the individual factors of the MetS (as defined by NCEP criteria) measured at each study time point (between and within study groups). Other secondary endpoints include change in each individual factor of the MetS (as defined by NCEP criteria) measured at each study time point (between and within study groups) and change of the variables given in table 1B measured at each study time point (between and within study groups).…”
Section: Objectives and Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, the following input assumptions were considered: The absolute reduction in MetS prevalence following substantial smoking cessation is expected to be 15%, based on the results of a range of lifestyle modification interventions (2226) The baseline prevalence of MetS in T2DM is expected to be 70% (27–30) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute reduction in MetS prevalence following substantial smoking cessation is expected to be 15%, based on the results of a range of lifestyle modification interventions (2226)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the results of several lifestyle modification interventions, the absolute reduction in MetS prevalence after smoking cessation is expected to be no less than 15% [ 24 28 ].…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size calculation is based on assumptions that the expected reduction in MetS prevalence after smoking cessation is 15% [ 24 28 ], and the expected baseline prevalence of MetS in T2D is 70% [ 29 32 ]. Sample size was calculated on the basis of demonstration of superiority, assuming a normal distribution of the sample [ 33 ].…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%