2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of speed enforcement with mobile radar on speed and accidents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A good practice analysis has confirmed the positive effect of fixed and mobile speed cameras on accident reduction on roads (Carnis & Blais, 2013;Čygaitė, Lingytė, Andriejauskas, & Vaitkus, 2013;Goldenbeld & van Schagen, 2005;Jones, Sauerzapf, & Haynes, 2008;Kaygisiz & Sümer, 2019). However, the camera catchment area is limited (Champness, Sheehan, & Folkman, 2005;De Pauw, Daniels, Brijs, Hermans, & Wets, 2014a;Li, Graham, & Majumdar, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A good practice analysis has confirmed the positive effect of fixed and mobile speed cameras on accident reduction on roads (Carnis & Blais, 2013;Čygaitė, Lingytė, Andriejauskas, & Vaitkus, 2013;Goldenbeld & van Schagen, 2005;Jones, Sauerzapf, & Haynes, 2008;Kaygisiz & Sümer, 2019). However, the camera catchment area is limited (Champness, Sheehan, & Folkman, 2005;De Pauw, Daniels, Brijs, Hermans, & Wets, 2014a;Li, Graham, & Majumdar, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mountain, Hirst, & Maher (2004) have determined that statistically significant reduction of 25% of fatal and injury accidents is reported up to 250 m before and up to 250 m behind the camera site. Having made a comprehensive statistical analysis, Hess (2004), like Mountain, Hirst, & Maher (2004), has also determined that the largest decrease in the number of fatal and injury accidents is reported within the distance of up to 250 m on both sides of the camera. With the increasing distance, the effect of camera is decreasing: at a distance of up to 250 m the number of fatal and injury accidents after installation of speed cameras decreased by 45.74%; up to 500 m -by 41.30%; up to 1 km -by 31.62%; up to 2 kmby 20.86%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature analysis showed that various methods are used to determine the effect of speed cameras. Most studies use naive before-after methods with control groups (Christie et al 2003;Cunningham et al 2008;Gains et al 2004;Goldenbeld, van Schagen 2005;Shin et al 2009). Other scientists use the empirical Bayes method (Gains et al 2005;Mountain et al 2004Mountain et al , 2005Newstead, Cameron 2003).…”
Section: The Impact Of Speed Cameras On Road Crashesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although existing methods to manage speed do influence actual speeds, in practice, it is typically to a limited extent and relies heavily on enforcement. Studies of different locations show different compliance rates with the speed limits, depending on road types (e.g., Goldenbeld and van Schagen 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%