2018
DOI: 10.3382/japr/pfy052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of steam conditioning and antimicrobial inclusion on feed manufacturing and inactivation of Enterococcus faecium, a Salmonella surrogate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, with evolving consumer demands and regulatory regimens, the quality of feed is no longer appreciated only in terms of supplying nutrients, but also in terms of hygienic status, direct effects on animal health and food safety. Understanding how feed manufacturing strategies affect bacteria inactivation in feedstuffs and/or gut microbial activity may become an important aspect of efficient animal production without antibiotics (22, 28, 75).…”
Section: Hydrothermal Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, with evolving consumer demands and regulatory regimens, the quality of feed is no longer appreciated only in terms of supplying nutrients, but also in terms of hygienic status, direct effects on animal health and food safety. Understanding how feed manufacturing strategies affect bacteria inactivation in feedstuffs and/or gut microbial activity may become an important aspect of efficient animal production without antibiotics (22, 28, 75).…”
Section: Hydrothermal Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are no regulations dictating techniques related to microbial control in feed processing. Consequently, feed manufacturing techniques differ based on throughput demands, geographical and climate restrictions, ambient conditions, diet formulation, ingredient availability, and various feed processing equipment (75). There are numerous studies indicating HTP significantly reduces microbial load in feed (22).…”
Section: Hydrothermal Processing and Microbial Status In The Feed Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a pathogen surrogate is a possible valid approach, and the target surrogate needs to be validated in laboratory conditions first (Hu and Gurtler, 2017). Enterococcus faecium, a Grampositive chain-shaped cocci, has been studied on our WVU poultry farm as a safer alternative for Salmonella during steam conditioning, antimicrobial inclusion, and standard/thermal aggressive pelleting during broiler feed manufacturing (Boney et al, 2018;Boltz et al, 2019). Enterococcus faecium has also been validated as a surrogate for Salmonella in almond pasteurization (Jeong et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later it was demonstrated that pelleting at 80°C showed to reduce most Salmonella and other coliforms, while pelleting over 90°C was not a lethal temperature for spore forming bacteria [64][65][66][67][68]. Boney et al found that mitigation potential was apparent with short term steam conditioning for 30 seconds was applied to a mash that was inoculated with an appropriate Salmonella surrogate at 71°C, and that potential increased with increased temperature to 81°C and 88°C [69]. Other pieces of equipment like expanders, have been shown to reduce the pathogen load in feed around 10 5 to 10 6 cfu/g utilizing temperatures between 115°C and 125°C, pressures up to 1,200 psi and exposure times of 10 to 20 seconds [70].…”
Section: Salmonella Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a minimum temperature of 73°C has demonstrated to be able to produce a 5-log reduction in ATCC 8459 counts, while temperatures above 80°C resulted in no detectable levels of the organism to be counted [79]. Studies in the feed mill environment using short-term steam conditioning of 10 seconds demonstrated a 3-log reduction in a surrogate E. faecium, while long-term steam conditioning of 60 seconds resulted in a 4-log reduction in E. faecium [69]. Another surrogate that could be considered is Pediococcus acidilactici (P. acidilactici), which has been used in lowmoisture pet food testing, which is comparable to poultry feeds as these are low moisture.…”
Section: Surrogatesmentioning
confidence: 99%