The effects of storage temperature on PBMC gene expression

Abstract

BackgroundCryopreservation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is a common and essential practice in conducting research. There are different reports in the literature as to whether cryopreserved PBMCs need to only be stored ≤ −150 °C or can be stored for a specified time at −80 °C. Therefore, we performed gene expression analysis on cryopreserved PBMCs stored at both temperatures for 14 months and PBMCs that underwent temperature cycling 104 times between these 2 storage temperatures. Real-time RT-PCR was performed to confirm the involvement of specific genes associated with identified cellular pathways. All cryopreserved/stored samples were compared to freshly isolated PBMCs and between storage conditions.ResultsWe identified a total of 1,367 genes whose expression after 14 months of storage was affected >3 fold in PBMCs following isolation, cryopreservation and thawing as compared to freshly isolated PBMC aliquots that did not undergo cryopreservation. Sixty-six of these genes were shared among two or more major stress-related cellular pathways (stress responses, immune activation and cell death). Thirteen genes involved in these pathways were tested by real-time RT-PCR and the results agreed with the corresponding microarray data. There was no significant change on the gene expression if the PBMCs experienced brief but repetitive temperature cycling as compared to those that were constantly kept ≤ −150 °C. However, there were 18 genes identified to be different when PBMCs were stored at −80 °C but did not change when stored < −150 °C. A correlation was also found between the expressions of 2′–5′- oligoadenylate synthetase (OAS2), a known interferon stimulated gene (IFSG), and poor PBMC recovery post-thaw. PBMC recovery and viability were better when the cells were stored ≤ −150 °C as compared to −80 °C.ConclusionsNot only is the viability and recovery of PBMCs affected during cryopreservation but also their gene expression pattern, as compared to freshly isolated PBMCs. Different storage temperature of PBMCs can activate or suppress different genes, but the cycling between −80 °C and −150 °C did not produce significant alterations in gene expression when compared to PBMCs stored ≤ −150 °C. Further analysis by gene expression of various PBMC processing and cryopreservation procedures is currently underway, as is identifying possible molecular mechanisms.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12865-016-0144-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Human skin identification using specific gene marker at different storage temperatures

“…Nevertheless, our study provided evidence that minimal change in temperature did not disturb LCE1D gene expression. Our results augmented the findings of Yang et al (2016), who also reported that different storage temperatures could activate or suppress different genes. However, such temperature changes did not show any significant alterations in gene expression.…”

Optimization of a Density Gradient Centrifugation Protocol for Isolation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

“…The density gradient separation principle was first described by Böyum A. [30,31] and quickly became the most popular PBMC preparation method. A major advantage of this method for lymphocyte immunophenotyping is the removal of most erythrocytes, granulocytes and nonvi- able cells from the sample [17].…”

Monitoring immune responses in the tumor microenvironment

“…However complexities exist in this analysis (Figure 1), particularly when considering use of archival versus fresh tissue. First, cryopreservation has been shown to alter certain immune cell subsets and cytokine profiles [1] as well as gene expression profiles [2] when assessing immune cell function in tumors and blood by flow cytometry, rendering this information less reliable compared to fresh tissue. Similarly, comparison of whole exome sequencing (WES) – important for determination of mutational burden and neoantigen prediction - in archival versus paired fresh tissue shows that genomic variants are lost by using formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue [3].…”