2020
DOI: 10.1002/smj.3129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of strategy and institutions on value creation and appropriation in firms: A longitudinal study of three telecom companies

Abstract: Using an emerging methodology, we quantify how three telecom firms (British Telecom, Deutsche Telecom, and Telecom Italia) have created and distributed economic value since privatization. Our focus is on explaining the extent to which various stakeholders-employees, customers, capital owners, and government-were able to appropriate the value created by the firms. Some similarities are found across the three companies, but we also found major differences. To explain patterns, we bring together (a) strategic dec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained are consistent with the researches of Almeida Costa and Zemsky (2021), Kern and Gospel (2020), Ekkayokkaya and Paudyal (2019), Sejodin et al (2019) and Sardari and Amiri (2019), because most of these studies have emphasized the importance of integrating sustainable value creation into firm sustainability strategies in a competitive market.…”
Section: Sustainable Value Creation Processsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results obtained are consistent with the researches of Almeida Costa and Zemsky (2021), Kern and Gospel (2020), Ekkayokkaya and Paudyal (2019), Sejodin et al (2019) and Sardari and Amiri (2019), because most of these studies have emphasized the importance of integrating sustainable value creation into firm sustainability strategies in a competitive market.…”
Section: Sustainable Value Creation Processsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is the first incremental contribution of this study. While many recent studies are focusing on value appropriation (Kern and Gospel, 2020; Liberman et al, 2017 Liberman et al, , 2018Garcia-Castro and Aguilera, 2015;Adams, 2017), our study has dived deeper explicating the corporate value creation process. More importantly, our study responds to the critique that RBVs and value creation framework have remained at a theoretical level often relying on conceptual arguments and being empirically deficit (Liberman et al, 2017;Armstrong and Shimizu, 2007).…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Scope For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…There have also been criticisms that the RBV is not amenable for empirical testing (Armstrong and Shimizu, 2007). While a number of recent studies explore the VCA theme and more specifically focused on value appropriation by stakeholders (Kern and Gospel, 2020;Liberman et al, 2017Liberman et al, , 2018Garcia-Castro and Aguilera, 2015;Adams, 2017), very few studies deconstruct the value creation process, per se, explicating assembling resources, building capabilities and delivering value to customers and shareholders. Having identified this as the first research gap, this study takes a holistic approach exploring the diverse value creating activities across the organization: from resource acquisition, orchestration, capability building and finally delivering value to customers and shareholders.…”
Section: Deconstructing Corporate Value Creation 2741mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the evidence that an actor's nonmarket strategy will be informed by their institutional environment (Dorobantu et al, 2017; Kern & Gospel, 2020), we began by engaging with historical accounts to appreciate the institutional context of both the UK and credit rating firms in the late 1970s. We were struck by the economic difficulties that faced the UK government including a series of IMF bailouts alongside problematic employment rates and inflation (Hickson, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%