2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2010.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of supplier‐to‐buyer identification on operational performance—An empirical investigation of inter‐organizational identification in automotive relationships

Abstract: a b s t r a c tOver the past decade conceptual and empirical research in operations management has embraced the idea that collaborative supplier-buyer relationships are a source of competitive advantage for manufacturing firms. Anecdotal evidence from the Japanese and U.S. automotive industry and emerging research suggests that inter-organizational identification of suppliers with their buyers, termed supplier-to-buyer identification, is an unexplored factor of relational advantage. This study presents a model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
2
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(187 reference statements)
3
95
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Carr & Pearson, 1999;Choi & Hartley, 1996;Corsten, Gruen, & Peyinghaus, 2011;Krause, Handfield, & Tyler, 2007;Salmi, 2006).In our formal interviews, the managers in the supply chain department, when asked to describe their relationship with suppliers, generally concurred that it was a good and interdependent relationship, despite a very demanding environment where the volumes and velocity are high. Good relationships with suppliers are crucial to cruise lines, for the time windows for loading supplies are frozen and no second chance exists for re-supplying the ships.…”
Section: The Supplier Relationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Carr & Pearson, 1999;Choi & Hartley, 1996;Corsten, Gruen, & Peyinghaus, 2011;Krause, Handfield, & Tyler, 2007;Salmi, 2006).In our formal interviews, the managers in the supply chain department, when asked to describe their relationship with suppliers, generally concurred that it was a good and interdependent relationship, despite a very demanding environment where the volumes and velocity are high. Good relationships with suppliers are crucial to cruise lines, for the time windows for loading supplies are frozen and no second chance exists for re-supplying the ships.…”
Section: The Supplier Relationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This study measured the trust-building capability on a four-item scale adapted from the literature on supply chain management and inter-organisational relationships (e.g., Booth, 2010;Corsten et al, 2011;Dyer and Chu, 2011;Gupta and Narain, 2012;Day et al, 2013). The trust-building capability was operationalised by items indicating the degree to which firms felt their direct material suppliers believed that they keep their promises, could be relied on to be honest, were a company that stood by their word, and would honestly inform them of any problem.…”
Section: Moderating Role Of Web-enabled Direct Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study measured the trust-building capability on a four-item scale adapted from the literature on supply chain management and inter-organisational relationships (e.g., Booth, 2010;Corsten et al, 2011;Dyer and Chu, 2011;Gupta and Narain, 2012;Day et al, 2013). The trust-building capability was operationalised by items indicating the degree to which firms felt their direct material suppliers believed that they keep their promises, could be relied on to be honest, were a company that stood by their word, and would honestly inform them of any problem.…”
Section: Moderating Role Of Web-enabled Direct Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%