1994
DOI: 10.1163/156856194x00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of surface oxidation and segregation on the adhesional wear behavior of aluminum—bronze alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be further supported by evidence of more severe surface damage (figures 15(a) versus (d) and figures 16(a) versus (e)). The probability of a bond forming between the mating surface and the counter face would rise, in accordance with Poggie et al, as a result of the diffusion of aluminium towards the mating surface, making the alloy more susceptible to adhesion and raising the adhesive wear phenomenon [55].…”
Section: Sliding Wear Behaviour 431 Wear Under Dry Conditionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This might be further supported by evidence of more severe surface damage (figures 15(a) versus (d) and figures 16(a) versus (e)). The probability of a bond forming between the mating surface and the counter face would rise, in accordance with Poggie et al, as a result of the diffusion of aluminium towards the mating surface, making the alloy more susceptible to adhesion and raising the adhesive wear phenomenon [55].…”
Section: Sliding Wear Behaviour 431 Wear Under Dry Conditionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…By reducing the amount of direct metal-tometal contact, such areas and entrapped/adhering debris minimize the severity of material removal. According to figures 9 and 12, the abrasive action brought on by the trapping of hard debris is to account for the initially rapid rate of rise in frictional heating and friction coefficient with test duration [55]. These solid debris fragments are produced in anticipation of yielding, followed by work hardening, fragmentation, and trapping of the originally contacting asperities on the sliding surfaces [55,56].…”
Section: Sliding Wear Behaviour 431 Wear Under Dry Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It seems that the Al 2 O 3 oxide layer generated due to interfacial friction heating fractures and traps between the specimen surface and counterface and leads to more material removal. 15 Because of the ineffective action of Al 2 O 3 in preventing interfacial interaction, this effect can be intensified by increasing the aluminium content in Cu-Al alloys. In contrast, formation of Cu 2 O with the strong adherence on surfaces of A1 and A2 alloys can effectively reduce interfacial interaction between sliding materials.…”
Section: Wear Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wear resistance can be considered inverse of volume loss. It seems that the Al 2 O 3 oxide layer generated due to interfacial friction heating fractures and traps between the specimen surface and counterface and leads to more material removal 15. Because of the ineffective action of Al 2 O 3 in preventing interfacial interaction, this effect can be intensified by increasing the aluminium content in Cu-Al alloys.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%