2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-007-9020-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Surface Roughness and Metal Temperature on the Heat-Transfer Coefficient at the Metal Mold Interface

Abstract: This article focused on the effects of surface roughness and temperature on the heat-transfer coefficient at the metal mold interface. The experimental work was carried out in a unique and versatile apparatus, which was instrumented with two types of sensors, thermocouples, and linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs). The monitoring of the two types of sensors was carried out simultaneously during solidification. The concurrent use of two independent sensors provided mutually supportive data, thereby… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the coupling of TC1 with LVDT1 and TC3 with LVDT2 was to detect the movement of the thermocouple tip as the material expanded and contracted in the course of an experiment. In fact, this coupling was first introduced in the literature, [1] which serves as the springboard for the present work. The core of each LVDT used was attached to the coupling unit (C in Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the coupling of TC1 with LVDT1 and TC3 with LVDT2 was to detect the movement of the thermocouple tip as the material expanded and contracted in the course of an experiment. In fact, this coupling was first introduced in the literature, [1] which serves as the springboard for the present work. The core of each LVDT used was attached to the coupling unit (C in Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] These modifications were introduced in an effort to increase the uniformity of the surface finish of the castings and, as such, reduce the variability of the experimental results. Figure 3 displays two castings obtained under the current version (A) vs the previous version (B) described in the literature, [1] which illustrates this difference. A few other comparisons between these two experimental setups are shown in Table I.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations