2019
DOI: 10.1080/01608061.2019.1632244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Temporal Placement of Feedback on Performance With and Without Goals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, many researchers have focused on evaluating the efficacy of different feedback timing options on performance. Some researchers have compared the relative effectiveness of feedback timing variations in isolation (e.g., continuous vs. intermittent feedback; Alavosius & Sulzer-Azaroff, 1990; presession vs. postsession feedback; Aljadeff-Abergel et al, 2017) or in combination with other interventions (e.g., behavioral skills training with immediate or postsession feedback; Barker et al, 2019; varying levels of accuracy with feedback delivered after one trial or 25 trials; Brand et al, 2020; presession vs. postsession feedback with or without goals; Wine et al, 2019) to teach socially relevant skills (e.g., teaching skills; Aljadeff-Abergel et al, 2017;interview skills;Barker et al, 2019). However, few researchers have completed feedback timing comparisons using a translational approach (e.g., frequent vs. infrequent feedback with specific or global feedback; Park et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, many researchers have focused on evaluating the efficacy of different feedback timing options on performance. Some researchers have compared the relative effectiveness of feedback timing variations in isolation (e.g., continuous vs. intermittent feedback; Alavosius & Sulzer-Azaroff, 1990; presession vs. postsession feedback; Aljadeff-Abergel et al, 2017) or in combination with other interventions (e.g., behavioral skills training with immediate or postsession feedback; Barker et al, 2019; varying levels of accuracy with feedback delivered after one trial or 25 trials; Brand et al, 2020; presession vs. postsession feedback with or without goals; Wine et al, 2019) to teach socially relevant skills (e.g., teaching skills; Aljadeff-Abergel et al, 2017;interview skills;Barker et al, 2019). However, few researchers have completed feedback timing comparisons using a translational approach (e.g., frequent vs. infrequent feedback with specific or global feedback; Park et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%