2008
DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.2.438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of tests on learning and forgetting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

13
258
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
13
258
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The testing effect is the phenomenon that retrieval practice leads to better long-term retention than additional study (for reviews see e.g., Rawson & Dunlosky, 2011;Roediger & Butler, 2011;Roediger, Putnam, & Smith, 2011;Roediger & Karpicke, 2006;Rowland, 2014). As in the studies conducted on distributed practice, most experiments on retrieval practice have been conducted using word lists or word pairs (e.g., Bouwmeester & Verkoeijen, 2011;Carpenter, Pashler, & Vul, 2006;Carpenter, Pashler, Wixted, & Vul, 2008;Toppino & Cohen, 2009;Tulving, 1967;Wheeler, Ewers, & Buonanno, 2003) and foreign vocabulary pairs (e.g., Carpenter et al, 2008;Carrier & Pashler, 1992;Fritz, Morris, Acton, Voelkel, & Etkind, 2007;Karpicke, 2009;Karpicke & Roediger, 2008;Pashler, Cepeda, Wixted, & Rohrer, 2005;Pyc & Rawson, 2007Toppino & Cohen, 2009). Some studies have found a beneficial effect of retrieval practice for first language vocabulary learning, with adults (e.g., Cull, 2000;Karpicke & Smith, 2012), as well as with primary school children (e.g., Goossens, Camp, Verkoeijen, Tabbers, & Zwaan, 2014;Metcalfe, Kornell, & Son, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testing effect is the phenomenon that retrieval practice leads to better long-term retention than additional study (for reviews see e.g., Rawson & Dunlosky, 2011;Roediger & Butler, 2011;Roediger, Putnam, & Smith, 2011;Roediger & Karpicke, 2006;Rowland, 2014). As in the studies conducted on distributed practice, most experiments on retrieval practice have been conducted using word lists or word pairs (e.g., Bouwmeester & Verkoeijen, 2011;Carpenter, Pashler, & Vul, 2006;Carpenter, Pashler, Wixted, & Vul, 2008;Toppino & Cohen, 2009;Tulving, 1967;Wheeler, Ewers, & Buonanno, 2003) and foreign vocabulary pairs (e.g., Carpenter et al, 2008;Carrier & Pashler, 1992;Fritz, Morris, Acton, Voelkel, & Etkind, 2007;Karpicke, 2009;Karpicke & Roediger, 2008;Pashler, Cepeda, Wixted, & Rohrer, 2005;Pyc & Rawson, 2007Toppino & Cohen, 2009). Some studies have found a beneficial effect of retrieval practice for first language vocabulary learning, with adults (e.g., Cull, 2000;Karpicke & Smith, 2012), as well as with primary school children (e.g., Goossens, Camp, Verkoeijen, Tabbers, & Zwaan, 2014;Metcalfe, Kornell, & Son, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, subjects explicitly retrieve the items by writing down their responses, alternatively saying them out loud. Covert retrieval on the other hand is less used in studies of the testing effect (e.g., Carpenter et al, 2006;Carpenter & Pashler, 2007;Carpenter, Pashler, Wixted &Vul, 2008). This procedure shares much with the Overt retrieval procedure because the students are explicitly instructed to test memory, but they are not asked or allowed to output their responses in any way (e.g., by writing it down or saying it aloud).…”
Section: The Difference Between Overt and Covert Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no direct comparison has been made between the two procedures, some few studies have used a Covert procedure (e.g., Carpenter, Pashler & Vul, 2006;Carpenter & Pashler, 2007;Carpenter et al, 2008). For example, Carpenter and Pashler (2007) examined whether Covert testing can enhance learning of visuospatial information in maps.…”
Section: The Difference Between Overt and Covert Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations