2010
DOI: 10.5089/9781455205318.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of the Global Crisison Islamic and Conventional Banks: A Comparative Study

Abstract: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate.This paper examines the performance of Islamic banks (IBs) and conventional banks (CBs) during the recent global crisis by looking at the impact of the crisis on profitability, cred… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
36
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…From the causality-in-variance/volatility spillover test, we can say that there is a risk transfer and hence a contagion between the global conventional equity markets and the Islamic equity. Thus, our findings contrast with the argument that Islamic equity markets are not supposed to transmit risk and volatility to and from conventional equity markets because they are fundamentally different (Dridi and Hassan, 2010;Chapra, 2008;Dewi and Ferdian, 2010). The findings are also insightful to better discern how the Islamic market volatility responds to the shocks from the global influential factors.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the causality-in-variance/volatility spillover test, we can say that there is a risk transfer and hence a contagion between the global conventional equity markets and the Islamic equity. Thus, our findings contrast with the argument that Islamic equity markets are not supposed to transmit risk and volatility to and from conventional equity markets because they are fundamentally different (Dridi and Hassan, 2010;Chapra, 2008;Dewi and Ferdian, 2010). The findings are also insightful to better discern how the Islamic market volatility responds to the shocks from the global influential factors.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…This financial crisis has increased volatility, volatility spillover and contagion among global financial markets including equity markets. Some argue that Islamic equity markets are not supposed to transmit risk and volatility to and from conventional equity markets because they are fundamentally different (Dridi and Hassan, 2010;Chapra, 2008;Dewi and Ferdian, 2010). As discussed in Rehman (2009), Islamic economic and financial principles bear relevance to the recent global turbulence and to the design of the post 2008 crisis financial order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity derives from the challenges in designing a market‐based instrument that satisfies the Islamic prohibition on interest payments and provides for sharing both profits and losses in the interest of monetary control and government financing. At the same time, some researchers have argued that Islamic financial institutions are better suited to absorbing macro‐financial shocks because they have structural advantages over the conventional banking model (Khan, ; Mills and Presley, ; Dridi and Hasan, ). El‐Gamal (), among others, has concluded that Islamic finance simply seeks to replicate the functions of conventional financial instruments, which are primarily a form of rent‐seeking legal arbitrage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are studies that support the dichotomy hypothesis for these markets (Hakim and Rashidian, 2002;Dewi and Ferdian, 2010) and contend that the Islamic markets have not been affected much by the recent global financial crisis (Chapra, 2008;Dridi and Hassan, 2010;Arouri et al, 2013) compared to their conventional counterparts. Others find a unidirectional relationship between these markets.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%