The effects of the introduction of the no‐smoking policy at HMYOI Warren Hill on bullying behaviour

Abstract

The current research explores the prevalence of bullying behaviour at HMYOI Warren Hill and the Carlford Unit. The introduction of the no-smoking policy at the establishment was also explored in relation to its effect on bullying behaviour given that tobacco has historically been the main item that young people have been bullied for. The Direct and Indirect Prisoner behaviour Checklist--Revised (DIPC-R) and a questionnaire designed to identify the effect of the introduction of the no-smoking policy on bullying behaviour were used within this study to answer the following questions: what is the prevalence of bullying behaviour at Warren Hill and the Carlford Unit, and do young people at Warren Hill and the Carlford Unit think that the rate and nature of bullying has been affected by the introduction of the no-smoking policy? One hundred and fifteen young people took part in the study. At Warren Hill, Bully/Victims were the most prevalent type identified and this was significantly greater than the number of young people identified as Pure Victims or Not Involved. On the Carlford Unit, Not Involved was the most prevalent type identified, and this finding provides limited support for the theories of bullying behaviour identified within the present study. The study found that the rate of bullying decreased following the introduction of the no-smoking policy at Warren Hill. The findings from this study are being used in the development of a new Violence Reduction Policy at HMYOI Warren Hill.

The importance of coping, threat appraisal, and beliefs in understanding and responding to fear of victimization: Applications to a male prisoner sample.

“…There is a dichotomous and scaled version. As a behavioral measure, it has been used extensively within prisons (e.g., Archer, 2007; Archer & Southall, 2009; Lawrence & Welfare, 2008; South & Wood, 2006).…”

Implicit cognitive aggression among young male prisoners: Association with dispositional and current aggression

“…The DIPC (Ireland & Ireland, 2008) has been validated on men, women, adults, and adolescents within prisons. As a behavioural measure, it has been used extensively within prisons (e.g., Archer & Southall, 2009;Lawrence & Welfare, 2008). It is included here as an explicit measure of aggression, namely one that asks directly about aggressive behaviours.…”

Implementation and impact of anti-smoking interventions in three prisons in the absence of appropriate legislation

“…Reluctance to implement smoking bans in prisons may result from concerns about discipline problems. However, smoking bans in prisons have been relatively well accepted by prisoners and staff and have caused fewer disturbances than expected (Carpenter et al, 2001;Hammond and Emmons, 2005;Lawrence and Welfare, 2008;Skolnick, 1990).…”